IARPG-OPS-2 · 2.0.11-wip Game concept + open mission-design system Six examples · local tools · standards · research · no live MMO claim
IARPG.COM INTELLIGENCE AGENT ROLE PLAYING GAME
Work in progress IARPG-OPS-2 2.0.11-wip
Updated Source hierarchy Corrections International fairness Evidence archive

Global publication search

Search the operations design system

Type to search standards, missions, roles, authorities, reports, sources, pages, schemas, and UAI memory.

CONF-04CurrentConformancePublished WIP

Round-Trip Preservation

Defines import, normalization, export, reimport, comparison, and preservation evidence for portable artifacts.

Direct answer

What does CONF-04 standardize?

Defines import, normalization, export, reimport, comparison, and preservation evidence for portable artifacts.

Category
Conformance
Requirement level
Level D — Simulatable
Implementation
Published WIP
Machine record
/records/round-trip-preservation.json

Purpose

What this record standardizes.

Defines import, normalization, export, reimport, comparison, and preservation evidence for portable artifacts.

Rationale

Portable intelligence-operation artifacts require inspectable boundaries, deterministic evidence, explicit recovery, and no silent loss or identity overclaim.

Normative requirements

What conforming implementations must, should, and may do.

01
MUSTrequired for conformance

Round-trip tests compare original, parsed, normalized, exported, and reimported representations separately.

02
MUSTrequired for conformance

Record IDs, UTC timestamps, significant array order, and unknown extensions survive a declared lossless round trip.

03
MUSTrequired for conformance

Invalid input remain exportable and never be silently rewritten as the original.

04
SHOULDrecommended unless a documented reason applies

Results distinguish exact byte match, semantic equality, canonical equality, and field loss.

Game interaction mapping

What players and interfaces do.

01Inspect artifact
02Compare evidence
03Record reason code
04Export local result
ValidateDeliverDebrief

Data contract

Inputs and outputs.

Inputs

  • Browser-local artifact
  • Applicable standard
  • Declared source context

Outputs

  • Reviewable result
  • Reason code
  • Local export
  • Preserved original

State contract

Allowed or expected transitions.

Allowed state transitions for this standard
FromEventTo
receivedrequirement evaluatedaccepted, quarantined, or rejected-with-source-untouched

Evidence and provenance

Review requirements for claims and consequential state.

  • Record source artifact ID, canonical digest, UTC event time, responsible local role label, and reason code.
  • Do not convert a digest, label, or generated statement into an identity or authoritative fact claim.

User-interface requirements

How the requirement must appear at the point of use.

  • Show the record code and requirement level at the point of use.
  • Expose the reason for pass, fail, quarantine, recovery, or rejection.
  • Provide direct links to canonical human and machine records.

Accessibility requirements

Equivalent access to essential information and controls.

  • Essential information is available without reliance on color, audio, motion, or a graph alone.
  • Keyboard, screen-reader, reduced-motion, high-zoom, mobile, and print equivalents are documented.

Telemetry events

Minimum event records for implementation review.

standard.round-trip-preservation.evaluated

Required fields:

event_idtimestamp_utcartifact_idrecord_coderesultreason_code

Abuse and exploit cases

What the implementation must anticipate.

  1. A participant attempts to remove unknown data during import or migration.
  2. A digest or declared label is presented as proof of human identity or approval.
  3. A consequential record is overwritten without a reason or preserved original.

Failure and recovery

Fail-closed behavior and recovery path.

FAILURE

Fail closed for irreversible publication or overwrite. Preserve original content, show the failing requirement, and allow export or non-destructive recovery.

RECOVERY

Retain the original artifact and review event, clone any repaired draft, and require a new explicit validation event before continuing.

Example implementation

A concise fictional game implementation.

The local tool evaluates CONF-04, writes a UTC reason-coded result, and exposes both original and resulting artifacts for export.

Open complete mission examples →

Related records and examples

Supporting research

Deep links into complete canonical reports.

Revision history

Published changes to this record.

2.0.4-wip2026-07-20T12:04:07Z UTC

Initial CONF-04 publication for IARPG-OPS-2 release-candidate hardening.

Connected tools and standards

Explore the wider AI ecosystem.