Psychotic Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition Presenting with Government or Espionage Delusions

Introduction: The Architecture of Persecution in the Compromised Brain

The abrupt emergence of a rigid, persecutory delusional framework in a previously high-functioning individual represents one of the most formidable diagnostic challenges in clinical psychiatry and neurology. When a patient presents with an unyielding conviction that hospital employees, government officials, foreign intelligence agents, or unknown spies are utilizing medical equipment, telecommunications, or implanted devices to monitor their thoughts or extract sensitive information, clinicians often instinctively suspect a primary psychiatric illness, such as schizophrenia or a primary delusional disorder. However, the human brain, when subjected to profound metabolic, immunological, neoplastic, or structural insults, routinely attempts to rationalize the resulting internal chaos by projecting it onto the external environment. This phenomenon transforms the immediate physical surroundings—particularly the highly monitored, technology-dense environment of a modern hospital—into an "Architecture of Persecution"1. Psychotic disorder due to another medical condition is a severe neuropsychiatric syndrome in which delusions, hallucinations, or disorganized thought processes are the direct physiological consequence of a somatic, neurological, or systemic inflammatory disease4. Unlike primary psychiatric disorders, which are traditionally considered idiopathic and follow a somewhat predictable, often insidious developmental trajectory, secondary psychoses are harbingers of an acute medical crisis. A failure to recognize the organic etiology lurking beneath an elaborate espionage narrative can lead to catastrophic clinical outcomes. These include irreversible neurocognitive damage, the unchecked metastasis of an occult neoplasm, or lethal iatrogenic complications resulting from the inappropriate administration of high-potency psychiatric treatments8. This comprehensive clinical report delineates the pathophysiological underpinnings, diagnostic criteria, etiological landscape, and management protocols for secondary psychoses presenting with persecutory and espionage themes. It emphasizes the critical necessity of a nuanced, tiered medical investigation, the careful assessment of decisional capacity, and the absolute imperative of avoiding premature psychiatric attribution.

The Phenomenology of the Influencing Machine and Medical Surveillance

To fully comprehend why secondary encephalopathies and neuroinflammatory states so frequently manifest as government or espionage delusions, the clinician must examine the intersection of neurobiology and cultural phenomenology. The integration of modern technology into a delusional system is not a novel phenomenon; rather, it is a continuously evolving psychological defense mechanism utilized by a compromised brain to explain the terrifying subjective experience of "passivity phenomena," wherein the patient feels a profound loss of ego boundaries and control over their own bodily sensations and thoughts1. In 1810, the case of James Tilly Matthews provided one of the earliest documented instances of this phenomenon; Matthews believed a gang of spies was tormenting him using a pneumatic "Air Loom" that manipulated magnetic fluids to control his mind12. A century later, in 1919, psychoanalyst Victor Tausk formalized this concept in his seminal paper on the "influencing machine." Tausk observed that patients experiencing acute psychosis frequently developed the belief that a diabolical apparatus—complete with wires, batteries, and electromagnetic transmitters—was controlling their central nervous system and extracting their thoughts for the benefit of a persecutory cabal1. Tausk theorized that the machine was a psychological projection of the patient's own alienated body and malfunctioning nervous system, externalized to make sense of inexplicable internal sensory aberrations2. In the contemporary clinical landscape, this neurobiological deficit in reality testing and the generation of aberrant salience has adapted to the digital age. Patients no longer hallucinate pneumatic air looms; instead, they develop variations of the "Truman Show delusion," a persecutory and grandiose belief system in which their lives are being secretly filmed by hidden cameras and broadcast to a massive audience, often orchestrated by government entities or corporate conglomerates15. The omnipresence of actual surveillance technology in modern society provides a plausible scaffolding for the psychotic mind to construct its paranoid architecture19. When an individual suffering from an underlying medical condition—such as a smoldering limbic encephalitis or a postictal confusional state—is brought into an emergency department or medical ward, the physical environment inadvertently reinforces this organic paranoia. The modern hospital is fundamentally a surveillance architecture, characterized by restricted access, constant observation by strangers in uniform, and a dense array of sophisticated monitoring technology21. A patient experiencing aberrant dopaminergic signaling or widespread cortical dysfunction may easily misinterpret the blinking lights of an intravenous infusion pump, the rhythmic alarms of a cardiac telemetry monitor, the acoustic thumping of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, or the physical constraints of an electroencephalography (EEG) array as instruments of espionage, mind-reading, or systemic torture14. The telemetry leads attached to the patient's chest are not perceived as life-saving cardiac monitors, but as government extraction devices; the phlebotomists drawing blood are not caregivers, but foreign intelligence operatives attempting to poison them or steal their DNA12. Understanding that the specific content of the delusion is heavily influenced by the immediate built environment allows clinicians to view the espionage narrative not merely as a symptom of psychological trauma, but as a metabolically or structurally compromised brain's desperate attempt to map extreme internal physiological distress onto the external physical world3.

Nosology and Diagnostic Requirements: DSM-5-TR and ICD-11

The diagnostic classification of psychotic disorders has evolved significantly in recent decades, shifting away from the outdated and somewhat misleading binary of "organic" versus "functional" psychoses, and moving toward a spectrum that distinguishes between "primary" (idiopathic) and "secondary" (medically attributable) psychotic states25. Both the American Psychiatric Association and the World Health Organization have established strict criteria to operationalize this distinction.

DSM-5-TR: Psychotic Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition

According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), the diagnosis of "Psychotic Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition" mandates the fulfillment of five stringent criteria4. The disorder is coded based on the predominant symptom profile: 293.81 for a presentation with prominent delusions, and 293.82 for a presentation with prominent hallucinations.

1. Criterion A: The patient must exhibit prominent hallucinations or delusions.
2. Criterion B: There must be definitive evidence from the patient's medical history, physical examination, or laboratory findings that the psychotic disturbance is the direct physiological consequence of another medical condition.
3. Criterion C: The disturbance is not better explained by another mental disorder. For instance, if the patient has a long-standing history of schizophrenia that has merely been exacerbated by a minor urinary tract infection, the diagnosis remains schizophrenia, not a secondary psychotic disorder.
4. Criterion D: The disturbance does not occur exclusively during the course of a delirium. If the delusions of espionage only occur when the patient is profoundly disoriented and suffering from a fluctuating level of arousal due to sepsis, the appropriate diagnosis is delirium.
5. Criterion E: The disturbance causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other critical areas of human functioning4.

ICD-11: Secondary Psychotic Syndrome

The International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11), aligns closely with the DSM-5-TR but utilizes the overarching category "6E61 Secondary psychotic syndrome"29. The ICD-11 defines this as a syndrome characterized by the presence of prominent hallucinations or delusions judged to be a direct pathophysiological consequence of a health condition not classified under mental and behavioral disorders. The ICD-11 explicitly notes that the symptoms must not be a psychologically mediated response to a severe medical condition—meaning that an acute stress reaction or adjustment disorder in response to a terrifying cancer diagnosis does not qualify as a secondary psychosis30. The ICD-11 allows clinicians to specify the precise phenomenological nature of the syndrome through granular sub-codes:

• 6E61.0: Secondary psychotic syndrome, with hallucinations.
• 6E61.1: Secondary psychotic syndrome, with delusions (the most appropriate code for isolated espionage and government surveillance paranoia).
• 6E61.2: Secondary psychotic syndrome, with hallucinations and delusions.
• 6E61.3: Secondary psychotic syndrome, with unspecified symptoms29.

Both diagnostic frameworks place the burden of proof heavily on the clinician to establish a definitive physiological link between the somatic disease and the disruption in reality testing, requiring a thorough exclusion of independent psychiatric comorbidities and toxicological influences.

Establishing Causality: The Triad of Atypicality, Temporality, and Explicability

Attributing a highly structured delusion of government espionage to a specific medical condition is an intellectually demanding task. Patients with primary psychiatric disorders commonly present to the hospital with concurrent, albeit etiologically unrelated, medical illnesses. To confidently establish true physiological causality and avoid both false-positive and false-negative attributions, clinicians must evaluate the presentation against three core epidemiological and clinical principles: atypicality, temporality, and explicability25.

Atypicality

An underlying medical cause for psychosis must be heavily suspected if the clinical presentation is atypical for a primary psychiatric disorder25. Primary schizophrenia typically presents with an insidious onset in late adolescence to early adulthood, often preceded by a noticeable prodromal phase characterized by social withdrawal, academic decline, and the emergence of negative symptoms35. A completely new-onset psychotic episode in a patient over the age of 40, or conversely, an abrupt onset in a prepubescent child, represents an extreme demographic atypicality that demands aggressive medical investigation25. Furthermore, the phenomenology of the psychosis itself may be atypical. While auditory hallucinations (particularly running commentaries or conversing voices) are the hallmark of primary schizophrenia spectrum disorders, the presence of isolated visual, olfactory, gustatory, or multimodality hallucinations significantly increases the statistical likelihood of a secondary medical cause, such as an occipital or temporal lobe lesion, or a neurodegenerative process25. Delusions in secondary psychosis can sometimes lack the bizarre, highly disorganized quality seen in advanced schizophrenia, presenting instead as highly crystallized, circumscribed paranoia regarding espionage that leaves the rest of the patient's intellect seemingly intact34.

Temporality

A chronological, temporal correlation must exist between the somatic pathology and the psychiatric manifestation25. Secondary psychosis is highly probable when the paranoid delusions begin shortly following the onset of a specific medical condition, fluctuate in severity in tandem with the underlying disease state (e.g., worsening when inflammatory markers rise), and resolve or significantly improve upon successful medical treatment of the root physiological cause25. For example, the emergence of espionage delusions when a patient with severe hypothyroidism stops taking their levothyroxine, and the complete resolution of the symptoms weeks after resuming the medication, provides robust evidence of a temporal cause-and-effect relationship25. However, clinicians must recognize exceptions to this rule; for example, psychosis associated with temporal lobe epilepsy (interictal psychosis) typically appears several years after the onset of the initial seizure disorder, reflecting long-term aberrant synaptic reorganization rather than an acute temporal trigger25.

Explicability

Finally, there must be a biologically plausible, explicable mechanism connecting the physical disease to the alteration in higher-order brain function25. Clinicians must ask whether the known pathophysiology of the identified medical illness is capable of producing the observed psychotic symptoms. For example, a right parietal lobe infarction producing contralateral neglect can logically and explicably manifest as a somatoparaphrenic delusion that a limb belongs to a foreign agent, or an autoimmune attack on N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors can plausibly disrupt glutamatergic signaling in the prefrontal cortex, leading directly to disorganized thought and reality distortion5. If a patient presents with florid espionage delusions and the only medical finding is mild, asymptomatic hypertension, the principle of explicability fails, and a primary psychiatric diagnosis is more likely33.

The Etiological Landscape of Secondary Psychoses

The range of medical, neurological, and inflammatory conditions capable of producing profound persecutory delusions is vast and multi-systemic. The diagnostic approach requires an intimate understanding of how distinct pathophysiological insults disrupt the neural networks responsible for reality testing, sensory perception, and environmental threat detection.

Neurological and Neoplastic Causes

Focal structural lesions in the central nervous system can precipitate highly specific delusional syndromes depending on their precise anatomical location. Lesions in the right hemisphere, particularly the right temporal, frontal, and parietal lobes, are frequently implicated in misidentification syndromes and intractable paranoia5. For instance, Capgras syndrome—the delusional belief that familiar individuals have been replaced by identical imposters, government clones, or androids—is strongly associated with structural or degenerative right temporal and frontal lobe pathology25. Cerebrovascular accidents (strokes) can induce psychotic symptoms due to ischemia in sensory tracts or associative cortices. Patients with right middle cerebral artery territory infarctions may present with acute paranoia, agitation, and complex visual hallucinations, while posterior cerebral artery lesions can produce peduncular hallucinosis39. Central nervous system neoplasms, including primary brain tumors (e.g., frontal glioblastomas, sphenoid wing meningiomas) and metastatic lesions, can generate psychosis either through direct mass effect on the limbic system and frontal lobes, or through globally increased intracranial pressure5. The subacute onset of an espionage delusion in a middle-aged adult with new-onset headaches should immediately raise suspicion for an intracranial space-occupying lesion45. Neurodegenerative conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Lewy Body Dementia, frequently feature psychotic symptoms in their moderate to advanced stages39. In these populations, delusions of theft, infidelity, phantom boarders, and detailed visual hallucinations are ubiquitous. Similarly, demyelinating diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS) can present with psychosis in approximately 2-4% of patients, frequently involving persecutory delusions that result from the accumulation of frontotemporal or periventricular white matter plaques39.

Seizure-Related Causes: Postictal and Interictal Psychoses

Epilepsy, particularly temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), has a profound and complex association with secondary psychosis26. The relationship between seizure activity and psychosis is categorized chronologically into ictal, postictal, and interictal psychoses. Postictal psychosis (PIP) is a distinct, dangerous, and frequently unrecognized clinical entity. According to the foundational diagnostic criteria established by Logsdail and Toone in 1988, PIP typically occurs after an exacerbation of seizure activity, most often a cluster of generalized tonic-clonic seizures or complex partial seizures with impaired awareness39. A defining hallmark of PIP is the "lucid interval"—a period ranging from 12 to 72 hours of apparently normal, clear consciousness immediately following the seizure cluster, before the abrupt and explosive eruption of florid psychosis53. The psychosis in PIP is intensely affect-laden, highly pleomorphic, and often involves grandiose, religious, or severe paranoid delusions (e.g., beliefs of being a targeted messiah, or a victim of government mind control) accompanied by dangerous agitation, unprovoked aggression, and a highly elevated risk of suicide56. The psychotic episode is usually self-limiting, lasting from several days to a few weeks, provided the underlying seizure activity is controlled53. Interictal psychosis, conversely, develops chronically between seizures in patients with long-standing epilepsy. It closely mimics primary schizophrenia in its phenomenology, though patients with interictal psychosis tend to have better-preserved affect and fewer negative symptoms than those with idiopathic schizophrenia42. Ictal psychosis, the rarest of the three, occurs concurrently with ongoing nonconvulsive status epilepticus (often focal) and is definitively diagnosed by capturing active epileptiform discharges on a continuous EEG during the psychotic behavior54.

Autoimmune and Inflammatory Encephalitides

The discovery and characterization of autoantibody-mediated encephalitides over the past two decades has revolutionized the fields of biological psychiatry and neurology43. Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) occurs when the host's immune system erroneously produces IgG autoantibodies directed against neuronal cell-surface proteins or synaptic receptors43. Anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, the most prevalent form of AE, is the paradigmatic example of what researchers now term "autoimmune psychosis"8. Often triggered by an underlying occult neoplasm (most commonly an ovarian teratoma in young females, acting as a paraneoplastic syndrome) or a preceding viral infection (such as Herpes Simplex encephalitis), the disease frequently presents with an isolated, rapidly progressive psychiatric phase8. Patients present with severe paranoia, elaborate espionage delusions, visual and auditory hallucinations, erratic and hypersexual behavior, and severe insomnia. Because overt focal neurological deficits are often absent in the first few weeks of the illness, these patients are almost universally admitted to psychiatric units under the mistaken diagnosis of acute schizophrenia, brief psychotic disorder, or a severe manic episode8. If left untreated, within days to weeks, the clinical picture inevitably deteriorates into a devastating neurological crisis. Patients develop profound catatonia, life-threatening autonomic instability (manifesting as extreme hyperthermia, wildly fluctuating blood pressure, and tachycardia), movement disorders (such as choreoathetosis and the pathognomonic repetitive orofacial dyskinesias that inhibit speech and swallowing), intractable seizures, and central hypoventilation requiring mechanical ventilation8. Other autoantibodies, including those targeting voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) complexes (LGI1, CASPR2), GABA-A and GABA-B receptors, and AMPA receptors, can similarly present with profound psychotic, affective, and cognitive disturbances prior to the onset of faciobrachial dystonic seizures or limbic amnesia8. Systemic autoimmune diseases, such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Hashimoto's encephalopathy, also have the capacity to breach the blood-brain barrier, causing diffuse neuroinflammation that manifests as acute psychosis, delirium, and severe cognitive dysfunction43.

Endocrine and Metabolic Disturbances

Severe metabolic derangements and endocrinopathies can fundamentally alter neurotransmitter synthesis, cerebral perfusion, and brain metabolism, reliably precipitating psychotic states.

• Thyroid Dysfunction: Both extreme hyperfunction and hypofunction of the thyroid gland can cause psychosis. Thyrotoxicosis, such as in uncontrolled Graves' disease or a thyroid storm, can induce "thyrotoxic psychosis," presenting with severe agitation, hyperarousal, mania, paranoia, and hallucinations71. Conversely, profound, long-standing hypothyroidism can result in "myxedema madness," a syndrome characterized by delusions of harm, intense persecution, guilt, auditory hallucinations, and apathetic withdrawal that borders on catatonia41.
• Other Endocrine Causes: Hypoparathyroidism and hyperparathyroidism (which disrupt crucial calcium homeostasis required for synaptic transmission), Cushing's disease (severe hypercortisolism), Addison's disease (adrenal insufficiency), and Sheehan's syndrome (postpartum pituitary necrosis) have all been documented as primary drivers of secondary psychosis34.
• Metabolic and Nutritional Derangements: Uremia from renal failure, hepatic encephalopathy, acute intermittent porphyria, Wilson's disease (copper accumulation in the basal ganglia), severe hypoglycemia, and profound vitamin deficiencies (e.g., Vitamin B12 deficiency, or Pellagra due to Niacin deficiency presenting with the classic "4 Ds": diarrhea, dermatitis, dementia, and delusions) are all potent metabolic triggers for reality distortion32.

Infectious Agents

Infectious diseases affecting the central nervous system must invariably be considered in the differential diagnosis of any new-onset psychosis.

• HIV/AIDS: The Human Immunodeficiency Virus can directly infect the CNS via macrophages, causing HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder and acute psychosis, which typically presents with grandiose or persecutory delusions32.
• Neurosyphilis: Treponema pallidum infection can lie dormant in the CNS for decades before presenting in its tertiary stage as general paresis. This devastating condition is characterized by progressive dementia, pupillary abnormalities (Argyll Robertson pupils), personality changes, and profound, often bizarre delusions of grandeur and persecution46.
• Other Infections: Herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE), Lyme disease (neuroborreliosis), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Toxoplasmosis (particularly in immunocompromised hosts) can also trigger localized neuroinflammation and resulting psychotic phenomena32.

Clinical Warning Signs (Red Flags) of Secondary Psychosis

Differentiating a primary psychiatric disorder from a secondary psychosis requires an exceptionally high index of clinical vigilance for "red flags"—clinical indicators that strongly suggest an underlying organic pathology rather than a functional psychiatric illness. The presence of even a single one of these signs in a patient presenting with an espionage or persecutory delusion necessitates an immediate, comprehensive, and aggressive medical investigation35.

Differential Diagnosis: Establishing Boundary Lines

To accurately diagnose Psychotic Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition, the clinician must methodically exclude several overlapping psychiatric, toxicological, and neurocognitive syndromes4.

The Tiered Diagnostic Workup

The medical investigation of new-onset psychosis, particularly when accompanied by any red flags or occurring in a patient without a prior psychiatric history, requires a highly systematic, multidisciplinary approach. Crucially, there is no rigid, universal laboratory panel mandated for all patients; rather, the workup must be meticulously tailored and stratified according to the patient's age, specific clinical presentation, physical examination findings, environmental risk factors, and local standards of medical care32.

Tier 1: Comprehensive Baseline Assessment

The initial evaluation aims to capture common, easily reversible systemic and metabolic causes.

• Clinical Evaluation: A detailed psychiatric and medical history must be obtained, heavily relying on collateral information from family members or caregivers to establish the exact timeline of symptom onset and the presence of any seemingly benign prodromal infectious, neoplastic, or subtle neurological symptoms (e.g., a "flu-like" illness a week prior to the psychotic break)46. A thorough physical and neurological examination must be performed to detect subtle focal deficits, extrapyramidal rigidity, or autonomic instability (such as abnormal pupillary responses or resting tachycardia)46.
• Laboratory Testing: The foundational laboratory panel includes a complete blood count (CBC) with differential to assess for hidden infection or megaloblastic anemia, a comprehensive metabolic panel (evaluating electrolytes, calcium, glucose, renal, and hepatic function), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), Vitamin B12, and folate32.
• Toxicology: A comprehensive urine and serum toxicology screen is mandatory to definitively rule out substance-induced etiologies, particularly amphetamines and hallucinogens46.

Tier 2: Advanced Screening and Neuroimaging

If the initial baseline evaluation is unrevealing but clinical suspicion remains high (e.g., abrupt onset, atypical age, presence of visual hallucinations, or any red flags), diagnostic testing must rapidly escalate.

• Infectious and Systemic Screens: Serological testing for HIV, rapid plasma reagin (RPR) for syphilis, antinuclear antibodies (ANA) to screen for lupus, and general inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein \[CRP\], erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR\]) should be obtained32.
• Neuroimaging: A structural brain scan is essential. While a non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT) scan can rule out massive hemorrhage or large tumors in an emergency setting, a high-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan of the brain, with and without gadolinium contrast, is the gold standard8. MRI is required to detect subtle space-occupying lesions, subacute strokes, demyelinating plaques in the periventricular white matter, or the mesial temporal hyperintensities characteristic of limbic encephalitis52.
• Electroencephalography (EEG): An awake and sleep EEG is a high-yield, low-risk investigation that is drastically underutilized in psychiatric admissions. It is critical for ruling out nonconvulsive status epilepticus (ictal psychosis), identifying temporal lobe spikes suggestive of TLE, or detecting generalized encephalopathic slowing. Crucially, the presence of the "extreme delta brush" pattern is highly specific to anti-NMDAR encephalitis and can accelerate the diagnosis even before antibody titers return8.

Tier 3: Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis and Autoimmune Panels

When autoimmune encephalitis, central nervous system infection, or occult neuroinflammatory processes are suspected (especially in the presence of unexplained cognitive decline, movement abnormalities, seizures, or unexplained EEG/MRI abnormalities), a lumbar puncture (LP) is strongly indicated74.

• Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Analysis: The CSF should be rigorously analyzed for opening pressure, cell count (to detect lymphocytic pleocytosis), protein, glucose, and specifically tested for oligoclonal bands (OCBs) and elevated IgG indices, which indicate active intrathecal inflammation68.
• Autoantibody Testing: Both CSF and serum must be sent for comprehensive autoimmune encephalitis panels (e.g., testing for anti-NMDAR, anti-LGI1, anti-GABA-B). It is clinically critical to test the CSF, as relying on serum testing alone can yield false negatives in up to 15% of anti-NMDAR encephalitis cases, leading to missed diagnoses and fatal outcomes48.
• Oncologic Screening: If an autoimmune encephalitis antibody is detected, aggressive whole-body oncologic screening (e.g., pelvic transvaginal ultrasound for ovarian teratoma, chest CT for small cell lung cancer, testicular ultrasound) is mandatory due to the highly paraneoplastic nature of many of these syndromes8.

Management, Decisional Capacity, and Family Communication

The clinical management of secondary psychosis is fundamentally bipartite: it requires the aggressive, definitive treatment of the underlying medical pathophysiology, occurring simultaneously with the cautious, symptom-directed management of the severe psychiatric manifestations4.

Treatment Paradigms

The primary, overriding goal is the rapid reversal of the somatic insult. Depending on the definitive diagnosis, this may involve the urgent surgical resection of a sphenoid wing meningioma or an ovarian teratoma, the initiation of broad-spectrum antiviral or antibacterial agents for infectious encephalitis, the administration of targeted antiepileptic drugs for postictal psychosis, or the deployment of aggressive immunotherapy (such as high-dose intravenous corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin \[IVIG\], or therapeutic plasma exchange) for autoimmune encephalitides8. The psychosis itself will not sustainably remit until the underlying physiological fire is extinguished. Symptom-directed psychiatric care must be approached with extreme, calculated caution. While low-dose atypical antipsychotics may be temporarily necessary to manage severe agitation, violent aggression, and terrifying persecutory delusions that pose an immediate risk to the patient or staff, they carry significant, potentially lethal risks in the organically compromised brain8. Specifically, patients suffering from anti-NMDAR encephalitis or Lewy Body Dementia exhibit a highly dangerous, paradoxical sensitivity to dopamine antagonists. The administration of standard doses of antipsychotics (particularly first-generation agents like haloperidol) in these patients can rapidly precipitate severe extrapyramidal symptoms, exacerbate an underlying catatonia, or induce fatal Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS)8. Consequently, benzodiazepines (such as lorazepam) and, in severe refractory cases, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) are frequently utilized as safer alternatives for managing secondary catatonia and severe, uncontrollable agitation while waiting for immunotherapies or antiepileptics to take effect67.

Assessing Decisional Capacity in the Paranoid Patient

Patients presenting with a highly rigid, encompassing delusional framework regarding government espionage or hospital surveillance will almost invariably refuse essential medical interventions. Because the hospital is perceived as the "Architecture of Persecution," the patient genuinely believes that an MRI machine is a lethal mind-reading device, a lumbar puncture is an attempt to implant a tracking microchip, or oral medications are toxic chemical weapons23. Consequently, the formal, documented assessment of medical decision-making capacity is an absolute ethical and legal imperative. Crucially, decisional capacity is not globally abolished simply by the presence of a psychotic diagnosis; it is strictly decision-specific and time-specific89. Clinicians routinely utilize structured, validated tools such as the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) to rigorously evaluate four specific psychological dimensions of capacity89:

1. Understanding: The patient's basic ability to comprehend the factual information regarding their medical condition, the nature of the proposed investigations (e.g., an EEG or MRI), and the stated risks and benefits of the interventions89.
2. Appreciation: The patient's ability to apply this factual information to their own specific, personal situation. This is the domain where paranoid patients most frequently fail. A patient may perfectly understand that an MRI takes magnetic pictures of the brain, but completely fail to appreciate its necessity, insisting that because their brain is already being mapped by the CIA, the doctors are lying about the machine's true purpose89.
3. Reasoning: The ability to logically weigh the options, manipulate the provided information, and compare the probable consequences of accepting versus refusing the medical intervention without relying on delusional premises91.
4. Expression of a Choice: The ability to clearly, consistently, and voluntarily communicate a treatment decision89.

In acute secondary psychosis, patients frequently fail the appreciation and reasoning domains due to the overwhelming, distorting influence of the persecutory delusion96. When capacity is formally deemed impaired by the attending physician or consulting psychiatrist, the clinical team must rapidly engage surrogate decision-makers (such as the legal next of kin, a medical proxy, or a court-appointed guardian) to secure informed consent for life-saving diagnostics and therapeutics, legally and ethically circumventing the patient's organically driven refusal91.

Family Communication

The sudden, inexplicable transformation of a high-functioning loved one into a terrified, paranoid, and unrecognizable individual is a deeply traumatic experience for the family unit. Transparent, empathetic communication from the clinical team is critical. The physicians must clearly explain the working hypothesis of a "secondary" or "organic" psychosis, explicitly differentiating it from a lifelong, chronic psychiatric illness like schizophrenia33. Families must be heavily educated that the bizarre espionage delusions—while terrifying to witness—are merely the brain's mechanical response to inflammation, electrical misfiring, or metabolic failure, and that the long-term prognosis is often highly favorable if the underlying medical cause can be successfully identified and eradicated33.

The Dangers of Premature Psychiatric Attribution

The most perilous cognitive error in the management of acute psychosis is premature diagnostic closure—the hasty labeling of a patient with a primary psychiatric disorder without exhaustively searching for, and ruling out, an underlying medical etiology. When an elaborate espionage delusion is dismissed simply as the unfortunate manifestation of new-onset schizophrenia, the systemic and personal consequences are disastrous8. Premature psychiatric attribution leads to the "warehousing" of patients in locked, acute psychiatric facilities where appropriate neurological testing, continuous EEG monitoring, and critical care infrastructure are completely unavailable. During this period of misdiagnosis, the underlying somatic pathology—whether it is an aggressively expanding frontal lobe glioblastoma, a smoldering temporal lobe seizure focus, or a relentless autoimmune attack on synaptic receptors—progresses unchecked, causing irreversible neuronal death5. Furthermore, the reflexive administration of high-potency antipsychotic medications by psychiatric staff attempting to control the delusional behavior can induce life-threatening iatrogenic complications, masking the organic deterioration beneath a chemically induced stupor or triggering a fatal neuroleptic crisis8. The medical community increasingly recognizes that a significant, albeit small, percentage of patients currently residing in chronic psychiatric care facilities under the label of "treatment-resistant schizophrenia" may actually be suffering from undiagnosed, smoldering neuroimmunological or neurological diseases that were missed during their initial psychotic break9.

Clinical Vignette: The Unmasking of the Surveillance State

Presentation: Ms. K, a 28-year-old previously healthy software engineer with no personal or familial psychiatric history, was brought to the hospital emergency department by her fiancé. Over the preceding five days, following a mild, unspecified upper respiratory infection, she had become increasingly erratic and hyper-vigilant. She developed an unshakeable, systematized belief that a consortium of foreign intelligence operatives had infiltrated her apartment building. She claimed that her smartphone, her laptop, and the building's HVAC system were emitting targeted microwave frequencies designed to extract proprietary algorithms from her cortex. Upon arriving at the emergency department, her paranoia escalated severely as she integrated the hospital into her "Architecture of Persecution." She pointed frantically to the cardiac telemetry monitors and intravenous infusion pumps in the bay, claiming they were "extraction machines" designed to siphon her memories and transmit them to a satellite. She violently refused all vital sign checks and oral medications, stating the nurses were operatives attempting to poison her with chemically laced tracking agents. Initial Course and Psychiatric Attribution: The emergency department physician, noting her florid delusions, severe agitation, and lack of obvious focal motor deficits, placed her on an involuntary psychiatric hold with a presumptive diagnosis of Schizophreniform Disorder. She was transferred to the locked inpatient psychiatric unit and administered intramuscular haloperidol and lorazepam to manage her extreme combativeness. Over the next 48 hours on the psychiatric unit, her mental state failed to improve; rather, it deteriorated precipitously. She became selectively mute, exhibited waxy flexibility, and began striking bizarre, rigid postures for hours at a time—classic signs of catatonia. Furthermore, she developed profound autonomic instability: her temperature spiked to 39.4°C (102.9°F), accompanied by severe resting tachycardia (130 bpm) and wildly labile blood pressure. She also developed continuous, rhythmic chewing and lip-smacking movements (orofacial dyskinesias). Diagnostic Pivot and Medical Workup: The attending psychiatrist recognized this constellation of symptoms—the highly abrupt onset in a 28-year-old, the rapid progression to catatonia, the new-onset movement disorder, and the development of severe autonomic instability combined with antipsychotic sensitivity—as glaring clinical red flags. The haloperidol was immediately discontinued due to the high suspicion of secondary catatonia or impending Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS). A multidisciplinary "code neuro" consult involving neurology, critical care, and internal medicine was initiated, and Ms. K was transferred to the medical intensive care unit. Ms. K lacked the decisional capacity to consent to invasive medical procedures. Under the MacCAT-T assessment framework, while she could physically express a choice (refusal), she completely failed the appreciation and reasoning domains due to her delusion that the diagnostic machines were military weapons. Her fiancé, acting as her legal medical proxy, provided surrogate consent for an escalated medical workup. A comprehensive metabolic panel, thyroid function tests, and urine toxicology screen were entirely unremarkable. A non-contrast MRI of the brain showed no structural lesions or hemorrhage. However, an extended EEG revealed generalized background slowing punctuated by an "extreme delta brush" pattern—an electrophysiological signature highly specific to autoimmune encephalopathy. A subsequent lumbar puncture demonstrated a mild lymphocytic pleocytosis and the presence of oligoclonal bands. Both serum and CSF were sent for an extended autoimmune encephalitis panel. Concurrently, a pelvic transvaginal ultrasound was ordered as part of the mandatory paraneoplastic screening protocol. The ultrasound revealed a 5-centimeter complex cystic mass in her right ovary, morphologically consistent with an ovarian teratoma. Definitive Diagnosis and Treatment: Four days later, the CSF panel returned definitively positive for anti-NMDA receptor IgG antibodies (Anti GluN1). The final diagnosis was radically shifted from a primary psychiatric disorder to Psychotic Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition (Anti-NMDAR Autoimmune Encephalitis). Under the care of the neurological and surgical teams, Ms. K underwent an urgent laparoscopic unilateral oophorectomy to remove the teratoma, effectively eliminating the primary antigenic trigger driving her immune system's attack on her brain. She concurrently received a five-day course of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone, followed by five sessions of therapeutic plasma exchange (plasmapheresis) to clear the circulating autoantibodies from her system. Over the ensuing four weeks, her autonomic instability completely resolved, her catatonic rigidity lifted, and the orofacial dyskinesias ceased. Most remarkably, her elaborate espionage delusions evaporated entirely. Upon achieving full lucidity, she retained only fragmented, dream-like memories of the hospital equipment acting as extraction machines, viewing them now with appropriate insight as the hallucinations of a sick mind. Following a brief period of inpatient neuro-rehabilitation, she was discharged home with full restoration of her premorbid cognitive and psychological baseline, having narrowly escaped the permanent neurological devastation of an unrecognised autoimmune psychosis.

Works cited

1. Modernism and the Machinery of Madness: Psychosis, Technology, and Narrative Worlds. Andrew Gaedtke. Cambridge \- The University of Chicago Press: Journals, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/713291
2. Introduction \- Modernism and the Machinery of Madness, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/modernism-and-the-machinery-of-madness/introduction/32AC942225212CDD089F3D65A9E263C1
3. (PDF) Psychosis Applied to Architecture \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399655942\Psychosis\Applied\to\_Architecture
4. Psychotic Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition | Psychology Today, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/psychotic-disorder-due-another-medical-condition
5. Psychotic Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition \- Psychiatry \- MSD Manuals, https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/psychiatric-disorders/schizophrenia-and-related-disorders/psychotic-disorder-due-to-another-medical-condition
6. Psychotic Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition \- Psychiatry \- Merck Manuals, https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/psychiatric-disorders/schizophrenia-and-related-disorders/psychotic-disorder-due-to-another-medical-condition
7. Table 3.20, DSM-IV to DSM-5 Psychotic Disorders \- Impact of the DSM-IV to DSM-5 Changes on the National Survey on Drug Use and Health \- NCBI, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519704/table/ch3.t20/
8. Autoimmune Psychosis: Why It Matters \- touchNEUROLOGY, https://touchneurology.com/psychiatric-disorders/journal-articles/autoimmune-psychosis-why-it-matters/
9. Ethical Implications of the Mild Encephalitis Hypothesis of Schizophrenia \- Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00038/full
10. The Evolving Standard of Care for Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Illness, https://jaapl.org/content/52/2/225
11. Delusions of technical alien control: a phenomenological description of three cases \- PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20068380/
12. The Influencing Machine: How Technology Shapes the Architecture of Psychosis \-, https://gettherapybirmingham.com/blog/how-psychosis-changes-over-time-through-technology/
13. The Electronic Harassment Delusion \- FAQs \- Dangerous Things Forum, https://forum.dangerousthings.com/t/the-electronic-harassment-delusion/28041
14. Technology and Delusions — JMirvish, https://jmirvish.com/technology-and-delusions
15. The Truman Show Delusion | Psychology Today, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-excess/201608/the-truman-show-delusion
16. The 'Truman Show' delusion: Life as a reality TV show | ScienceDaily, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120621125448.htm
17. The "Truman Show" delusion: psychosis in the global village \- PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22640240/
18. Understanding Truman Show Delusion: When You Think Life Is a Reality TV Show, https://pmgcare.com/understanding-truman-show-delusion/
19. Learning from Delusions \- Brian Martin, https://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/15ts.html
20. As Medical Technology Evolves, So Do the Symptoms of Schizophrenics and Hyperchondriacs, https://www.mddionline.com/design-engineering/as-medical-technology-evolves-so-do-the-symptoms-of-schizophrenics-and-hyperchondriacs
21. Lost in space: The place of the architectural milieu in the aetiology and treatment of schizophrenia \- Emerald Insight, https://www.emerald.com/f/article/31/9-10/427/100881/Lost-in-spaceThe-place-of-the-architectural-milieu
22. Architectural Design Qualities of an Adolescent Psychiatric Hospital to Benefit Patients and Staff \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10621023/
23. Understanding Paranoia \- Living With Schizophrenia, https://livingwithschizophreniauk.org/information-sheets/understanding-paranoia/
24. Architecture, the Urban Environment and Severe Psychosis: Aetiology, https://www.urbandesignmentalhealth.com/journal2-psychosis.html
25. Secondary psychoses: an update \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3619167/
26. Secondary psychoses: an update \- PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23471787/
27. Introduction (Section 1\) \- Secondary Schizophrenia, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/secondary-schizophrenia/introduction/C7AE9EA723F62AFF73D617D87730E8ED
28. Chapter 2: Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders \- SweetStudy, https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chapter2-docx-5143659
29. How do psychiatrists code secondary/organic psychosis? : r/Psychiatry \- Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/Psychiatry/comments/11ztrzk/how\do\psychiatrists\code\_secondaryorganic/
30. 6E61 Secondary psychotic syndrome \- ICD-11 MMS \- Find-A-Code, https://www.findacode.com/icd-11/code-696956921.html
31. Porencephaly and Psychosis: A Rare Case of Neurological and Psychiatric Intersection, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11480457/
32. Psychosis Caused by a Somatic Condition: How to Make the Diagnosis? A Systematic Literature Review \- MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/9/1439
33. Secondary Psychosis \- CURESZ Foundation, https://curesz.org/2022-07-01-secondary-psychosis/
34. Religion and health: The more we know the more we need to know \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235886087\Religion\and\health\The\more\we\know\the\more\we\need\to\_know
35. The Red Flags: Early Warning Signs of Psychosis You Can't Afford to Ignore \- Ubie, https://ubiehealth.com/doctors-note/schizophrenia-psychosis-red-flags-warning-67-signs1e10
36. Understanding Psychosis \- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis
37. Smoking in different stages of psychosis \- UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository), https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/135015781/Thesis.pdf
38. Assessing Diagnosis and Symptoms Profiles of Late-Life Psychosis \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263918372\Assessing\Diagnosis\and\Symptoms\Profiles\of\Late-Life\_Psychosis
39. Psychotic Symptoms in Patients With Major Neurological Diseases \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10921039/
40. The causes of psychosis (Chapter 1\) \- Cambridge University Press & Assessment, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/diagnosis-of-psychosis/causes-of-psychosis/3BF53FB8C7F53E76107BD98E9EE60963
41. Hypothyroidism-Induced Psychotic Disorder with Prolonged Antipsychotic Treatment: A Case Report \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13056238/
42. Epilepsy and Psychiatry in the 21st Century, http://thaiepilepsysociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Epilepsy-and-Psychiatry-for-neuro-resident\2020\_-%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%9E-%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A3-%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3.pdf
43. A clinical approach to new-onset psychosis associated with immune dysregulation \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5809809/
44. (PDF) Neurobehavioral Syndromes \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221873545\Neurobehavioral\_Syndromes
45. Neurological disease \- Clinical Gate, https://clinicalgate.com/2015/03/03/neurological-disease-2/
46. Recognition and Differential Diagnosis of Psychosis in Primary Care | AFP \- AAFP, https://www.aafp.org/afp/2015/0615/p856
47. First Episode Psychosis Medical Workup \- UNC School of Medicine, https://www.med.unc.edu/psych/epi-nc/wp-content/uploads/sites/720/2026/02/First-Episode-Psychosis-Medical-Work-up-Maja-Skikic-MD-2020-2.pdf
48. Autoimmune antibodies in first-episode psychosis with red flags: A hospital-based case-control study protocol \- Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976159/full
49. Psychotic Disorders: Types, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment \- WebMD, https://www.webmd.com/schizophrenia/mental-health-psychotic-disorders
50. Multiple Sclerosis and Secondary Psychosis: Case Report and Literature Review, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/408267884\Multiple\Sclerosis\and\Secondary\Psychosis\Case\Report\and\Literature\_Review
51. ABSTRACTS FOR E-POSTERS : Indian Journal of Psychiatry \- Ovid, https://www.ovid.com/jnls/indianjpsychiatry/fulltext/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry\59\_26\~abstracts-for-e-posters
52. Focal neurological disease (Chapter 6\) \- The Diagnosis of Psychosis, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/diagnosis-of-psychosis/focal-neurological-disease/0DC167CB194FFF31C56D91D52175873B
53. Postictal Psychosis: Common, Dangerous, and Treatable \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2265810/
54. Postictal Psychosis: Case Report and Literature Review \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10036178/
55. Psychosis Caused by Medical Conditions: Symptoms & Treatment Guide \- Change Direction, https://www.changedirection.org/conditions/psychotic-disorder-due-to-a-medical-condition
56. Hiding in Plain Sight: A case of post ictal psychosis with suicidal behavior \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11869959/
57. Successful management of postictal violence with pindolol in temporal lobe epilepsy \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6883303/
58. A clinical study of post-ictal psychoses \- Saudi Journal for Health Sciences, https://journals.lww.com/sjhs/fulltext/2015/04020/a\clinical\study\of\post\ictal\_psychoses.4.aspx
59. You Are The One Who Was Beating Me": A Case Report of a Patient with Postictal Psychosis Secondary to Bilateral Temporal Lobe Epilepsy \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6890155/
60. Autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders manifesting with psychosis \- JCI, https://www.jci.org/articles/view/196507
61. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis \- Johns Hopkins University, https://pure.johnshopkins.edu/en/publications/a-clinical-approach-to-diagnosis-of-autoimmune-encephalitis/
62. Autoimmune encephalitis: clinical spectrum and management | Practical Neurology, https://pn.bmj.com/content/21/5/412
63. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. \- ean.org, https://www.ean.org/research/resources/neurology-updates/detail/a-clinical-approach-to-diagnosis-of-autoimmune-encephalitis
64. University of Groningen Autoimmune psychosis Pollak, Thomas A.; Lennox, Belinda R.; Müller, Sabine; Benros, Michael E.; Prüss,, https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/661565369/1\s2.0\S2215036619302901\_main.pdf
65. Autoimmune Encephalitis With Psychotic Manifestations and Cognitive Impairment Presenting as Schizophrenia: Case Report and Literature Review \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8882583/
66. Autoimmune Encephalitis in Long-Standing Schizophrenia: A Case Report \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8873086/
67. Autoimmune Psychosis Exists: Early Diagnosis of an Anti‐NMDA Receptor Autoimmune Encephalitis Presenting as First‐Episode Psychosis in a 25‐Year‐Old Male—A Case Report \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12754262/
68. The Neuropsychiatric Checklist for Autoimmune Psychosis: A Narrative Review, https://d-nb.info/1379324300/34
69. Psychosis: What It Is, Symptoms, Causes, Types & Treatment \- Cleveland Clinic, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/symptoms/23012-psychosis
70. Neuropsychiatric Disorders (Chapter 8\) \- Seminars in General Adult Psychiatry, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/seminars-in-general-adult-psychiatry/neuropsychiatric-disorders/378680C1E9C1816F74DCEAFB02A23711
71. Psychosis as the Initial and Main Presentation of Graves' Disease: A Case Report from Saudi Arabia \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12834080/
72. Pellagra With Casal Necklace Causing Secondary Schizophrenia With Capgras Syndrome in a Homeless Man \- Psychiatrist.com, https://www.psychiatrist.com/pcc/pellagra-casal-necklace-secondary-schizophrenia-capgras-syndrome-homeless-man/
73. Acute Psychosis: Differential Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management | Request PDF, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369473097\Acute\Psychosis\Differential\Diagnosis\Evaluation\and\_Management
74. The spectrum of psychosis in people with neurological disease | BJPsych Advances, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bjpsych-advances/article/spectrum-of-psychosis-in-people-with-neurological-disease/1D03CB6A6D8373F89A31A0316F868B42
75. Medical evaluation of first presentation of psychotic symptoms in children and adolescents, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1678974/full
76. New Onset Psychosis \- Nationwide Children's Hospital, https://www.nationwidechildrens.org/-/media/nch/for-medical-professionals/clinical-pathways/ip-psychosis-new-onset-clinical-pathway.pdf
77. The postictal state — What do we know? \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7317965/
78. Psychotic Disorders | Neupsy Key, https://neupsykey.com/psychotic-disorders/
79. Substance- or Medication-Induced Psychotic Disorder \- Psychiatry \- MSD Manuals, https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/psychiatric-disorders/schizophrenia-and-related-disorders/substance-or-medication-induced-psychotic-disorder
80. Alcohol-induced psychotic disorder: A systematic literature review \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274725575\Alcohol-induced\psychotic\disorder\A\systematic\literature\_review
81. Medical evaluation of first presentation of psychotic symptoms in children and adolescents, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13121259/
82. Approach to New-Onset Psychosis in Pediatrics: A Review of Current Practice and an Interdisciplinary Consensus-Driven Clinical Pathway at a Single-Center Institution \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370680106\Approach\to\New-Onset\Psychosis\in\Pediatrics\A\Review\of\Current\Practice\and\an\Interdisciplinary\Consensus-Driven\Clinical\Pathway\at\a\Single-Center\_Institution
83. Full article: Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome: Current Perspectives, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2147/NDT.S362202
84. Evaluation of Autoimmune Psychosis : NEJM Journal Watch \- Ovid, https://www.ovid.com/journals/nejmjw/fulltext/10.1056/nejm-jw.na53684\~evaluation-of-autoimmune-psychosis
85. Prevalence of Clinically Actionable Cerebrospinal Fluid Abnormalities in First Episode Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | medRxiv, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.22.25338558v3.full-text
86. Prevalence of Cerebrospinal Fluid Abnormalities in First Episode Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis \- medRxiv, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.22.25338558.full.pdf
87. Morphometric MRI findings in patients with suspected autoimmune psychosis spectrum syndromes and association with EEG slowing, CSF changes, and psychometric/neuropsychological findings \- Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1648946/full
88. Autoantibody-associated psychiatric symptoms and syndromes in adults: A narrative review and proposed diagnostic approach \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8474611/
89. The assessment of decision‐making competence in... : Perspectives in Psychiatric Care \- Ovid, https://www.ovid.com/00006474-201804000-00017
90. Impact of Built Environment on the Process of Psychological Treatment of Children and Youth \- MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/1/24
91. Influence of Psychiatric Symptoms on Decisional Capacity in Treatment Refusal, https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/influence-psychiatric-symptoms-decisional-capacity-treatment-refusal/2017-05
92. Mental capacity, diagnosis and insight in psychiatric in-patients: a cross-sectional study \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7611628/
93. The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9355168/
94. MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), https://www.prpress.com/MacArthur-Competence-Assessment-Tool-for-Treatment-MacCAT-T\p\_169.html
95. Face and Content Validity of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for the Treatment of Iranian Patients \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5634061/
96. Relationship Between Cognitive Functions and Decision-Making Capacity in Older Institutionalized Patients with Schizophrenia: A Preliminary Study \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9017691/
97. Assessing Medical Decision-Making Competence Using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool–Treatment for Schizophrenia \- Psychiatrist.com, https://www.psychiatrist.com/pcc/assessing-medical-decision-making-competence-using-macarthur-competence-assessment-tool-treatment-for-schizophrenia/
98. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools for assessing decision-making capacity in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis \- PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27876273/
99. From Mild Encephalitis Hypothesis to Autoimmune Psychosis \- and remaining challenges, https://search.proquest.com/openview/d9c8d3537ff399e89a79e6557aabefd0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar\&cbl=4933639