Work in progress IARPG-OPS-2 2.0.21-wip

Global publication search

Search the operations design system

Type to search standards, missions, roles, authorities, reports, sources, pages, schemas, and UAI memory.

Archival orientation → current-source proposal

Build country context
without flattening the country.

Start from the dated six-lens World Context snapshot, then create a separate proposal from current, attributable sources. Institutions, practical authority, rights, communities, infrastructure, environment, alliances, disagreement, and uncertainty stay visible together.

Proposal—not live intelligence. The composer makes no current claim by itself, performs no web research, calculates no country score, and stores nothing remotely.

Direct answer

What does the Country Context Composer do?

It helps an author turn one of the 195 country-roadmap entries into a reviewable current-context proposal without treating the archival 2025 source as current truth. It requires source dates, identity, type, scope, confidence, uncertainty, rights, oversight, affected-community context, correction history, and at least one non-external perspective before a proposal can pass its publication gate.

Roadmap choices
195
Archival profile coverage
195 / 195
Source-code collisions retained
8
Runtime
Browser-local; no account or remote storage

How to use this page

Use the archival layer as a question generator—not an answer key.

The composer exposes what the 2025 snapshot says, but the current proposal must be built separately from renewed sources. Formal institutions and practical authority may differ; disagreement and missing evidence must stay visible.

  1. 01
    Choose a roadmap countryThe country selector maps to one or more archival source components without collapsing identity differences.
  2. 02
    Inspect all six archival lensesUse place, people, institutions, economy, infrastructure, and environment to identify questions and stale fields.
  3. 03
    Add current claims one source at a timePublication date, access date, source identity, type, scope, confidence, perspective, and review state are mandatory.
  4. 04
    Run publication and fairness checksThe gate blocks missing uncertainty, rights, oversight, affected communities, corrections, and non-external perspectives.
Read the international fairness method

Browser-local authoring workspace

Separate the layers.
Show the evidence burden.

A current profile remains a proposal until an author supplies current sources and passes review. Imported files stay local; invalid originals remain downloadable without modification.

Loading the 195-country roadmap and archival context routes…

Proposal identity

Name, scope, and cutoff

Draft · not checked

Layer 2 · current-context proposal

Required analytical sections

10 sections

These narrative sections summarize reviewed current claims. They do not replace the source-by-source claim ledger below.

Source-by-source evidence

Current claim ledger

Every current claim requires a publication date, access date, source identity, source type, scope, confidence statement, perspective origin, language, and review state.

No current claims added. Archival fields cannot fill this ledger automatically.

Layer 3 · inference boundary

Analyst assumptions

Assumptions remain separate from observations and require a rationale, confidence statement, and test needed.

No analyst assumptions recorded.

Layer 4 · fictional translation

Gameplay translations

Gameplay concepts must cite the claim records they draw from and explain safeguards against national, cultural, religious, demographic, or institutional typecasting.

No fictional gameplay translations recorded.

Correction and supersession

Keep revision history visible

A first-draft or correction record is required before publication.

Publication gate

What still blocks publication?

Not checked

Run validation after selecting a country and adding current-source evidence.

Comparative fairness

Where is the evidence burden uneven?

Not checked

Import or compose at least one proposal, then compare adjective intensity, threat framing, uncertainty, rights coverage, source perspective, and review depth.

Imported proposal shelf

Valid drafts and quarantined originals

0 records

No imported records. Loading the template creates a local draft without a network research step.

Accessible non-visual output

Plain-language proposal record

Country Context Composer is ready. Select a roadmap country to begin.

Equal evidence does not mean identical wording

Compare the method.
Do not score the country.

The fairness review looks for unequal adjective intensity, unsupported threat framing, missing uncertainty, missing rights and oversight, absent affected-community perspectives, and inconsistent source burdens. Findings are editorial prompts—not country rankings.

NO INFERENCE SHORTCUT

One vote is not an alliance.

Neither geography, religion, ethnicity, trade volume, one arms purchase, one vote, nor one shared adversary establishes alignment.

NO COMPOSITE SCORE

Context stays multidimensional.

No development, morality, threat, stability, loyalty, dangerousness, recruitability, or targetability score is calculated.

NO ARCHIVAL PROMOTION

Dated context stays dated.

The 2025 source can identify research questions. It cannot silently become a current claim or replace renewed evidence.

NO HIDDEN SOURCE BURDEN

Every current claim shows its provenance.

Dates, source identity, source type, scope, confidence, perspective, language, and review state travel with the claim.

Connected tools and standards

Explore the wider AI ecosystem.