{
  "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/world-systems-research-review-register.schema.json",
  "id": "https://iarpg.com/world-systems-research-review-register.json",
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.21-wip",
  "status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
  "source_collection": "world-systems-governance-and-resilience",
  "report_count": 6,
  "disposition_count": 36,
  "truth_boundary": "These are publication and design dispositions, not exhaustive fact-checking, legal advice, scientific certification, live intelligence, or authorization for harmful operational use.",
  "reports": [
    {
      "report_slug": "power-in-practice-formal-institutions-informal-authority-oversight-and-public-legitimacy",
      "title": "Power in Practice: Formal Institutions, Informal Authority, Oversight, and Public Legitimacy",
      "source_name": "Comparative Power Practice Global Report.md",
      "source_sha256": "8e5aabd065af77c1bc1c3a284365e3153cf86cbb7fc61027a1475934cf5c6db6",
      "canonical_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/power-in-practice-formal-institutions-informal-authority-oversight-and-public-legitimacy",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "reviewed_synthesis_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/power-in-practice-formal-institutions-informal-authority-oversight-and-public-legitimacy#reviewed-synthesis",
      "disposition_ids": [
        "WSR-OPS2-221-01-01",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-01-02",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-01-03",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-01-04",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-01-05",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-01-06"
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_slug": "domestic-politics-of-alignment",
      "title": "Domestic Politics of Alignment: Why Countries Cooperate, Hedge, Realign, or Remain Nonaligned",
      "source_name": "Domestic Politics of Alignment.md",
      "source_sha256": "c1babf28c23074e73f3608bad27475a80ec6b7df916af5d321c9bcd6c8d27b99",
      "canonical_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/domestic-politics-of-alignment",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "reviewed_synthesis_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/domestic-politics-of-alignment#reviewed-synthesis",
      "disposition_ids": [
        "WSR-OPS2-221-02-01",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-02-02",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-02-03",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-02-04",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-02-05",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-02-06"
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_slug": "regional-organizations-and-small-state-agency",
      "title": "Regional Organizations and Small-State Agency: How States Exercise Influence Beyond Raw Power",
      "source_name": "Small-State Regional Influence Analysis.md",
      "source_sha256": "4dbd2905c46c29a3f235b000620d37f789620b51772848f9a1750976d24185cc",
      "canonical_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/regional-organizations-and-small-state-agency",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "reviewed_synthesis_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/regional-organizations-and-small-state-agency#reviewed-synthesis",
      "disposition_ids": [
        "WSR-OPS2-221-03-01",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-03-02",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-03-03",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-03-04",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-03-05",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-03-06"
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_slug": "global-strategic-dependencies-and-resilience-atlas",
      "title": "Global Strategic Dependencies and Resilience Atlas: What Connects Countries and Constrains Their Choices",
      "source_name": "Global Strategic Dependencies Report.md",
      "source_sha256": "3f1b99d9ea820ecb1b4cee9b8d83b23eb8134715a23f4838fd5a5155199b79fb",
      "canonical_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/global-strategic-dependencies-and-resilience-atlas",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "reviewed_synthesis_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/global-strategic-dependencies-and-resilience-atlas#reviewed-synthesis",
      "disposition_ids": [
        "WSR-OPS2-221-04-01",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-04-02",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-04-03",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-04-04",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-04-05",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-04-06"
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_slug": "intelligence-cooperation-evidence-reliability-and-analytic-disagreement",
      "title": "Intelligence Cooperation, Evidence Reliability, and Analytic Disagreement",
      "source_name": "Intelligence Analysis And Oversight.md",
      "source_sha256": "a1c683b7e61edaa4318d8a6d118af30fb4e01e0b228ef74ee3a48a7e58a3fcbe",
      "canonical_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/intelligence-cooperation-evidence-reliability-and-analytic-disagreement",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "reviewed_synthesis_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/intelligence-cooperation-evidence-reliability-and-analytic-disagreement#reviewed-synthesis",
      "disposition_ids": [
        "WSR-OPS2-221-05-01",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-05-02",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-05-03",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-05-04",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-05-05",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-05-06"
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_slug": "crisis-cascades-resilience-and-recovery",
      "title": "Crisis Cascades, Resilience, and Recovery: How Shocks Move Through Interconnected Societies",
      "source_name": "Systemic Crisis Resilience Report.md",
      "source_sha256": "fdca02e4b7489baed7449e5697c6f67d9a934d8c8c55581d87b2a4876c621586",
      "canonical_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/crisis-cascades-resilience-and-recovery",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "reviewed_synthesis_url": "https://iarpg.com/docs/report/crisis-cascades-resilience-and-recovery#reviewed-synthesis",
      "disposition_ids": [
        "WSR-OPS2-221-06-01",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-06-02",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-06-03",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-06-04",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-06-05",
        "WSR-OPS2-221-06-06"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "dispositions": [
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-01-01",
      "report_slug": "power-in-practice-formal-institutions-informal-authority-oversight-and-public-legitimacy",
      "topic": "authority distinction",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Separate formal, delegated, practical, informal, emergency, national, subnational, customary, and contested authority."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-01-02",
      "report_slug": "power-in-practice-formal-institutions-informal-authority-oversight-and-public-legitimacy",
      "topic": "country profiles",
      "disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "bounded_statement": "Treat officeholders, reforms, and contemporary country-specific descriptions as time-sensitive claims requiring current primary or authoritative sources."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-01-03",
      "report_slug": "power-in-practice-formal-institutions-informal-authority-oversight-and-public-legitimacy",
      "topic": "implementation gaps",
      "disposition": "bounded",
      "bounded_statement": "Describe implementation limits with evidence and alternatives; do not infer incapacity, corruption, or intent from one policy failure."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-01-04",
      "report_slug": "power-in-practice-formal-institutions-informal-authority-oversight-and-public-legitimacy",
      "topic": "public legitimacy",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Represent legitimacy as contested and multidimensional rather than as a morality or stability score."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-01-05",
      "report_slug": "power-in-practice-formal-institutions-informal-authority-oversight-and-public-legitimacy",
      "topic": "security-sector influence",
      "disposition": "bounded",
      "bounded_statement": "Discuss institutional roles, civilian authority, oversight, and remedy without national or regional typecasting."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-01-06",
      "report_slug": "power-in-practice-formal-institutions-informal-authority-oversight-and-public-legitimacy",
      "topic": "country context reuse",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Use the framework to structure current-country proposals, not to auto-generate current political conclusions from archival data."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-02-01",
      "report_slug": "domestic-politics-of-alignment",
      "topic": "country as plural actor",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Model governments, institutions, political coalitions, and populations separately."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-02-02",
      "report_slug": "domestic-politics-of-alignment",
      "topic": "current cases and polling",
      "disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "bounded_statement": "Re-check every contemporary policy, officeholder, poll, election, coalition, and alignment claim before factual reuse."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-02-03",
      "report_slug": "domestic-politics-of-alignment",
      "topic": "public opinion",
      "disposition": "bounded",
      "bounded_statement": "Require transparent method and dates; do not treat elections or social media as direct measures of national opinion."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-02-04",
      "report_slug": "domestic-politics-of-alignment",
      "topic": "bureaucratic continuity",
      "disposition": "corrected-terminology",
      "bounded_statement": "Prefer permanent institutions, civil service continuity, and veto points over conspiratorial or pejorative shorthand."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-02-05",
      "report_slug": "domestic-politics-of-alignment",
      "topic": "nonalignment and hedging",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Treat multi-alignment as domain-specific strategy with costs, constraints, and domestic constituencies."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-02-06",
      "report_slug": "domestic-politics-of-alignment",
      "topic": "gameplay translation",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Represent internal blocs and implementation friction without political persuasion, voter targeting, or demographic profiling."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-03-01",
      "report_slug": "regional-organizations-and-small-state-agency",
      "topic": "organization taxonomy",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Retain distinctions among continental, subregional, supranational, issue-specific, identity, economic, and security organizations."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-03-02",
      "report_slug": "regional-organizations-and-small-state-agency",
      "topic": "small-state agency",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Represent agenda setting, procedure, legal expertise, geography, coalition building, chairmanship, brokerage, and issue linkage."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-03-03",
      "report_slug": "regional-organizations-and-small-state-agency",
      "topic": "current membership and decisions",
      "disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "bounded_statement": "Verify membership, withdrawal, suspension, budgets, leadership, and implementation from current official sources."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-03-04",
      "report_slug": "regional-organizations-and-small-state-agency",
      "topic": "enforcement and implementation",
      "disposition": "bounded",
      "bounded_statement": "Do not infer that a declaration was implemented; record monitoring, funding, and compliance evidence."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-03-05",
      "report_slug": "regional-organizations-and-small-state-agency",
      "topic": "major-power control claims",
      "disposition": "rejected-without-evidence",
      "bounded_statement": "Do not describe an organization as a puppet or proxy without evidence of direction or control."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-03-06",
      "report_slug": "regional-organizations-and-small-state-agency",
      "topic": "fictional translation",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Use plural secretariats, decision rules, small-state coalitions, and internal disagreement in fictional regional institutions."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-04-01",
      "report_slug": "global-strategic-dependencies-and-resilience-atlas",
      "topic": "domain-specific dependency",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Keep separate records for energy, food, water, transport, finance, data, technology, labor, medical, insurance, and emergency-support relationships."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-04-02",
      "report_slug": "global-strategic-dependencies-and-resilience-atlas",
      "topic": "ownership and control",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Distinguish financing, ownership, operation, maintenance, standards, access, and sovereign authority."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-04-03",
      "report_slug": "global-strategic-dependencies-and-resilience-atlas",
      "topic": "current statistics and network status",
      "disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "bounded_statement": "Re-check every figure, route, capacity, concentration, market share, and infrastructure status before contemporary publication."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-04-04",
      "report_slug": "global-strategic-dependencies-and-resilience-atlas",
      "topic": "universal dependency score",
      "disposition": "rejected-for-public-reuse",
      "bounded_statement": "Do not collapse domain-specific relationships into a country rank, weakness score, or hidden-control claim."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-04-05",
      "report_slug": "global-strategic-dependencies-and-resilience-atlas",
      "topic": "affected communities",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Include workers, consumers, indigenous peoples, rural and coastal communities, displaced people, and rights or remedy impacts where supported."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-04-06",
      "report_slug": "global-strategic-dependencies-and-resilience-atlas",
      "topic": "security boundary",
      "disposition": "restricted",
      "bounded_statement": "Do not publish exploitable infrastructure details, attack paths, unprotected coordinates, or disruption guidance."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-05-01",
      "report_slug": "intelligence-cooperation-evidence-reliability-and-analytic-disagreement",
      "topic": "intelligence lifecycle",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Use requirement, acquisition, preservation, evaluation, corroboration, analysis, alternatives, confidence, review, dissemination, feedback, correction, and archive as distinct stages."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-05-02",
      "report_slug": "intelligence-cooperation-evidence-reliability-and-analytic-disagreement",
      "topic": "source and information evaluation",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Keep source reliability separate from information credibility and preserve caveats."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-05-03",
      "report_slug": "intelligence-cooperation-evidence-reliability-and-analytic-disagreement",
      "topic": "confidence language",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Define high, moderate, low, disputed, not established, and unknown by evidence quality, not severity."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-05-04",
      "report_slug": "intelligence-cooperation-evidence-reliability-and-analytic-disagreement",
      "topic": "case-specific claims",
      "disposition": "requires-source-review",
      "bounded_statement": "Treat public case studies as historical learning material whose details and interpretations require source-level verification."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-05-05",
      "report_slug": "intelligence-cooperation-evidence-reliability-and-analytic-disagreement",
      "topic": "classification and authority",
      "disposition": "corrected",
      "bounded_statement": "Classification and official status do not by themselves prove accuracy; anonymous repetition does not become independent corroboration."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-05-06",
      "report_slug": "intelligence-cooperation-evidence-reliability-and-analytic-disagreement",
      "topic": "operational tradecraft",
      "disposition": "restricted",
      "bounded_statement": "Exclude clandestine recruitment, source handling, intrusive surveillance, evasion, hacking, infiltration, targeting, or evidence destruction guidance."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-06-01",
      "report_slug": "crisis-cascades-resilience-and-recovery",
      "topic": "five model families",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Keep footprint, propagation, agent-network, event-sourced, and comparative models distinct and purpose-bound."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-06-02",
      "report_slug": "crisis-cascades-resilience-and-recovery",
      "topic": "case-study claims",
      "disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "bounded_statement": "Re-check event figures, causal claims, institutional findings, and recovery outcomes before factual reuse."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-06-03",
      "report_slug": "crisis-cascades-resilience-and-recovery",
      "topic": "model outputs",
      "disposition": "bounded",
      "bounded_statement": "Present conditional ranges, assumptions, disagreements, and validation limits; never label a scenario as inevitable prediction."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-06-04",
      "report_slug": "crisis-cascades-resilience-and-recovery",
      "topic": "affected communities and rights",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Include community agency, accessibility, displacement, privacy, rights, remedy, and unequal impacts."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-06-05",
      "report_slug": "crisis-cascades-resilience-and-recovery",
      "topic": "correction and recovery",
      "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
      "bounded_statement": "Require correction triggers, reversible actions, recovery indicators, and preserved event history."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "WSR-OPS2-221-06-06",
      "report_slug": "crisis-cascades-resilience-and-recovery",
      "topic": "harmful implementation",
      "disposition": "restricted",
      "bounded_statement": "Do not create attack, weapons-effect, casualty, pathogen, cyber-exploit, infrastructure-disruption, or target-selection tools."
    }
  ]
}