{
  "standard_version": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "profile_version": "2.0.4-wip",
  "mission_id": "IARPG-MSN-001",
  "slug": "port-access-anomaly-investigation",
  "title": "Port Access Anomaly Investigation",
  "authority": "Port Meridian Civic Continuity Office",
  "authority_code": "CIV-01",
  "customer": "Metropolitan continuity council",
  "mandate": "Collect and assess information within the declared fictional jurisdiction and report uncertainty without forcing a preferred conclusion.",
  "jurisdiction": "Port Meridian civil port systems",
  "intelligence_requirement": "Determine whether repeated privileged export events reflect insider disclosure, automation failure, or fabricated traffic intended to trigger a purge.",
  "known_facts": [
    "A triggering anomaly or request has been logged.",
    "The authority has access to some but not all relevant records.",
    "At least two explanations remain plausible."
  ],
  "assumptions": [
    "Current system clocks are synchronized within the published tolerance.",
    "Declared access records have not yet been proven complete."
  ],
  "competing_hypotheses": [
    "Administrative or technical failure",
    "Authorized but poorly documented activity",
    "Deliberate disclosure or manipulation",
    "Fabricated evidence intended to redirect attention"
  ],
  "roles": [
    "Operative",
    "Handler",
    "Intelligence Analyst",
    "Technical Operator"
  ],
  "information_asymmetry": {
    "Operative": [
      "Role-specific tasking",
      "Authorized evidence subset"
    ],
    "Handler": [
      "Role-specific tasking",
      "Authorized evidence subset"
    ],
    "Intelligence Analyst": [
      "Role-specific tasking",
      "Authorized evidence subset"
    ],
    "Technical Operator": [
      "Role-specific tasking",
      "Authorized evidence subset"
    ]
  },
  "collection_plan": [
    "Access-control review",
    "Witness interview",
    "Technical log collection",
    "Open-source schedule comparison"
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "source_id": "SRC-01",
      "class": "human-or-record",
      "reliability": "unknown-at-tasking",
      "access": "limited",
      "handling": "compartmented"
    }
  ],
  "player_interactions": [
    "Review tasking",
    "Establish access",
    "Collect evidence",
    "Mark contradiction",
    "Request corroboration",
    "Choose continue, convert, or abort",
    "Complete extraction and debrief"
  ],
  "cover_and_access": "Use a mission-appropriate fictional professional cover or declared inspection authority; access must be plausible and documented.",
  "evidence_threshold": "Deliver an assessment only after two independent evidence classes corroborate the leading explanation.",
  "synthetic_source_policy": "disclosed-and-claim-only",
  "compromise_indicators": [
    "Unexpected access challenge",
    "Unexplained route change",
    "Source behavior inconsistent with prior handling",
    "Evidence item lacking provenance",
    "Role handoff not acknowledged"
  ],
  "abort_conditions": [
    "Cover integrity below 35",
    "Source safety cannot be maintained",
    "Jurisdiction is exceeded",
    "Required evidence custody cannot be preserved"
  ],
  "extraction_plan": "Extract through the public maintenance corridor or abort to remote debrief if cover integrity falls below 35.",
  "debrief_deliverable": "An assessment that separates observation, source report, interpretation, hypothesis, confidence, dissent, source impact, cover impact, and follow-on requirements.",
  "reward_posture": "authority-reviewed",
  "reason_codes": true,
  "fiction_boundary": true,
  "states": [
    "Task",
    "Plan",
    "Access",
    "Collect",
    "Validate",
    "Deliver",
    "Extract",
    "Debrief"
  ],
  "transitions": [
    {
      "from": "Task",
      "action": "accept tasking",
      "to": "Plan"
    },
    {
      "from": "Plan",
      "action": "approve plan",
      "to": "Access"
    },
    {
      "from": "Access",
      "action": "establish access",
      "to": "Collect"
    },
    {
      "from": "Collect",
      "action": "submit evidence packet",
      "to": "Validate"
    },
    {
      "from": "Validate",
      "action": "meet threshold",
      "to": "Deliver"
    },
    {
      "from": "Deliver",
      "action": "complete handoff",
      "to": "Extract"
    },
    {
      "from": "Extract",
      "action": "reach extraction or remote debrief",
      "to": "Debrief"
    }
  ],
  "failure_paths": [
    "Abort",
    "Compromise",
    "Partial success",
    "Converted objective"
  ],
  "seed": "hollow-signal",
  "supporting_standards": [
    "mission-brief-contract",
    "mission-lifecycle",
    "roles-and-information-asymmetry",
    "provenance-confidence-and-corroboration",
    "compromise-abort-handling",
    "mission-event-logging",
    "deterministic-mission-state-machines",
    "debrief-product-contract"
  ],
  "supporting_reports": [
    "/docs/report/intelligence-operative-archetypes-and-tradecraft",
    "/docs/report/justice-system-and-warrant-escalation-for-rogue-intelligence",
    "/docs/report/hallucinated-ai-quest-design-in-vr-mmorpgs"
  ],
  "evidence_events": [
    "Observation or source report recorded with origin and UTC event time",
    "Provenance and chain of custody reviewed",
    "Corroboration or contradiction relationship recorded",
    "Assessment and reason code published"
  ],
  "extraction_states": [
    "Primary extraction",
    "Alternate extraction",
    "Emergency extraction",
    "Remote debrief"
  ],
  "debrief_outputs": [
    "Objective status",
    "Evidence acquired",
    "Unresolved uncertainty",
    "Source impact",
    "Cover impact",
    "Access status",
    "Follow-on requirements"
  ]
}