--- uai: "1.0" type: project-context status: active stable_id: iarpg-current-context project: iarpg.com release: IARPG-OPS-2 version: "2.0.14-wip" review_state: current-until-superseded --- # Project Context ## Verified Current Facts - IARPG means Intelligence Agent Role Playing Game. It is a fictional international intelligence role-playing game concept plus the open design publication used to define, test, explain, and research it. - The current website is a WIP reference publication, not a live persistent MMO, native VR client, matchmaking service, production account platform, or deployed player economy. - `/start` is the canonical first-time guide. Its hero remains a responsive linked map for Game Concept, Missions, Create Missions, Standards, and Research. Evidence: [hero report](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/hero-clarity-report-integration-and-uai-routing-report.md#the-new-hero-is-an-interactive-site-map). - Primary navigation is Start Here, Game Concept, Missions, Create Missions, Standards, and Research. - Search and release context are in a compact non-sticky masthead. The sticky menu row contains the IARPG logo, primary navigation, menu control, and theme control. One compact non-sticky orientation/evidence rail follows it; `.menu-strip` is the only sticky surface. Evidence: [UI density findings](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/interface-density-and-navigation-polish-report.md#findings). - The site has five layers: game concept, six complete fictional missions, browser-local workbenches, 70 standards and schemas, and research/governance evidence. - Durable inventory: 355 preserved source files, 229 canonical reports, 238 pointer records, and 98 active UAI records. Evidence: [durable index](../docs/long-term-memory/index.md#current-authoritative-reports). - All 94 members of the latest supplied archive are individual Markdown files under `/docs`; 64 are exact duplicate evidence and 30 have canonical source-derived reports. The archive filename is provenance only. - The 30 reports introduced in 2.0.12 are now **reviewed with limitations**. Use only their `Reviewed Synthesis` sections as current guidance; preserved source-derived prose remains archival. Evidence: [claim-level audit](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/claim-level-review-and-comparative-fairness-audit.md#findings). - The review corrects current law, real-agency identity, clinical and rights boundaries, age and consent, accessibility, vendors, market figures, software capabilities, and international comparative framing. It does not certify compliance or exhaustively fact-check every archival sentence. - Authority affiliation changes tasking and constraints; it never assigns permanent moral alignment to a country, culture, institution, religion, diagnostic group, or role. - International scope uses equal evidence standards, rights review, explicit uncertainty, affected-community context, source diversity, endonym awareness, and a 195-country coverage roadmap. - Create Missions, Operation Package, and Simulate provide optional local five-step walkthroughs that do not auto-open, call network APIs, or mutate work data. - Runtime remains PHP 8.1+, vanilla JavaScript, local CSS/assets, and Apache or LiteSpeed rewrites with no database, package manager, CDN, analytics, or third-party runtime dependency. - **Verified:** the Alliance Observatory, Faction Directory, and Network Influence Lab expose a fictional browser-local world system with 12 factions, 27 relationships, 14 relationship types, 8 domains, 12 safe mission seeds, alliance stress tests, faction anatomy, and a 10-level influence-evidence continuum. Evidence: [integration findings](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/alliance-faction-and-network-world-system-integration-report.md#findings). - **Verified:** all six supplied alliance and faction reports are individually preserved, canonically wrapped, marked reviewed with limitations, and routed through 36 machine-readable publication dispositions. Current real-world claims require fresh primary or authoritative verification. - **Safety boundary:** recruitment and influence are modeled as organizational access, evidence, prevention, refusal, disengagement, and reintegration. The site does not publish recruitability scores, vulnerability profiles, coercive scripts, covert contact methods, targeting criteria, or instructions for joining real groups. ## Assumptions - Current public pages, implementation, tests, machine manifests, Reviewed Synthesis sections, and pointer records are the deployment baseline unless a later verified build supersedes them. - External law, policy, vendor, product, clinical, and software sources can change. Re-check high-sensitivity claims before later publication or implementation. - Reports outside the reviewed 30 retain their existing review states and truth boundaries. ## Proposals - Apply the claim-register method to the next risk-ranked batch of unverified reports, prioritizing clinical, legal, security, surveillance, operationally actionable, and named-vendor claims. - Conduct affected-community, disability, clinical, legal, and international-local review before publishing sensitive hospital, diagnosis, consent, or institutional mechanics. - Conduct moderated first-click and comprehension research, then test the exact archive on an externally reachable production-matched HTTPS host. ## Unresolved Questions - Do unfamiliar visitors understand the static search row, sticky branded navigation row, five-path hero, and current-versus-future product boundary? - Which remaining unverified reports should be corrected, restricted, superseded, or removed from public synthesis first? - Native Firefox, native assistive-technology speech output, unrestricted external-host Chromium, production-edge behavior, field Core Web Vitals, and host-owned live crawler/search evidence remain open. - Full dedicated coverage for all 195 roadmap entries remains incomplete.