{ "$schema": "./claim-review-register.schema.json", "register_id": "IARPG-CLAIM-REVIEW-OPS2-213", "release": "IARPG-OPS-2", "version": "2.0.14-wip", "status": "work-in-progress", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "scope": { "reports": 30, "source_collection": "saudi-intelligence-security-apparatus-archive", "review_rule": "Reviewed synthesis controls current reuse; preserved source prose remains archival and non-authoritative.", "not_legal_or_medical_advice": true }, "disposition_counts": { "not-established": 25, "design-hypothesis": 25, "corrected": 76, "jurisdiction-dependent": 12, "rejected": 25, "self-reported": 2, "verified-current": 2 }, "reports": [ { "report_slug": "comprehensive-research-framework-unspecified-topic", "title": "Comprehensive Research Framework for an Unspecified Topic", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/comprehensive-research-framework-unspecified-topic.md", "source_name": "Comprehensive Research Framework.md", "source_sha256": "26f38db4244659b65afc3ae37e60f01d7564db5a3f2ff2bcba1e892fcbc31f9c", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This document is retained as a topic-neutral research-planning framework. It is reviewed as methodology, not as evidence for any real-world claim or product decision.", "fairness_boundary": "Apply the same source-quality and uncertainty rules across countries and populations while still requiring local-language, legal, cultural, and affected-community context.", "claims": [ { "topic": "scope", "source_claim": "The document functions as a comprehensive report despite having no defined research question or subject.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "A topic-free template is a planning aid only. It cannot establish findings, conclusions, market size, legal status, clinical outcomes, or product requirements.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "retain-as-method-template", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-1F6304EF-01" }, { "topic": "examples", "source_claim": "Cross-domain examples and numbers illustrate methods.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Examples are illustrative prompts, not evidence about any specific jurisdiction, population, market, product, or intervention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-illustrative", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-1F6304EF-02" }, { "topic": "method", "source_claim": "A structured report format by itself produces reliable research.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Reliability requires a defined question, source hierarchy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, date and jurisdiction scope, conflict handling, and reproducible validation in addition to formatting.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "use-method-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-1F6304EF-03" }, { "topic": "fairness", "source_claim": "A single generic method can be applied identically without local context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use equal evidentiary standards while adapting language, cultural context, affected-community participation, legal sources, and uncertainty to each jurisdiction and population.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-1F6304EF-04" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "comprehensive-research-report-general-template", "title": "Comprehensive Research Report: General Template", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/comprehensive-research-report-general-template.md", "source_name": "Comprehensive Research Report (General Template).md", "source_sha256": "12067687b61a0ad486c03039084e976e7ce61f402ffba223b9f901f304c57892", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This document is retained as a general report template. It is reviewed as methodology, not as evidence for any real-world claim or product decision.", "fairness_boundary": "Apply the same source-quality and uncertainty rules across countries and populations while still requiring local-language, legal, cultural, and affected-community context.", "claims": [ { "topic": "scope", "source_claim": "The document functions as a comprehensive report despite having no defined research question or subject.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "A topic-free template is a planning aid only. It cannot establish findings, conclusions, market size, legal status, clinical outcomes, or product requirements.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "retain-as-method-template", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-B499825F-01" }, { "topic": "examples", "source_claim": "Cross-domain examples and numbers illustrate methods.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Examples are illustrative prompts, not evidence about any specific jurisdiction, population, market, product, or intervention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-illustrative", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-B499825F-02" }, { "topic": "method", "source_claim": "A structured report format by itself produces reliable research.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Reliability requires a defined question, source hierarchy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, date and jurisdiction scope, conflict handling, and reproducible validation in addition to formatting.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "use-method-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-B499825F-03" }, { "topic": "fairness", "source_claim": "A single generic method can be applied identically without local context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use equal evidentiary standards while adapting language, cultural context, affected-community participation, legal sources, and uncertainty to each jurisdiction and population.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-B499825F-04" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "deep-research-report-clarification-and-exploratory-study", "title": "Deep Research Report: Clarification and Exploratory Study", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/deep-research-report-clarification-and-exploratory-study.md", "source_name": "Deep Research Report Clarification and Exploratory Study.md", "source_sha256": "c9b39b9044ca55ee6e11657542bc6628b62da19e51aa825c5a43539ca199b6ce", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This document is retained as an exploratory clarification exercise with no settled subject. It is reviewed as methodology, not as evidence for any real-world claim or product decision.", "fairness_boundary": "Apply the same source-quality and uncertainty rules across countries and populations while still requiring local-language, legal, cultural, and affected-community context.", "claims": [ { "topic": "scope", "source_claim": "The document functions as a comprehensive report despite having no defined research question or subject.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "A topic-free template is a planning aid only. It cannot establish findings, conclusions, market size, legal status, clinical outcomes, or product requirements.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "retain-as-method-template", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-3996E904-01" }, { "topic": "examples", "source_claim": "Cross-domain examples and numbers illustrate methods.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Examples are illustrative prompts, not evidence about any specific jurisdiction, population, market, product, or intervention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-illustrative", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-3996E904-02" }, { "topic": "method", "source_claim": "A structured report format by itself produces reliable research.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Reliability requires a defined question, source hierarchy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, date and jurisdiction scope, conflict handling, and reproducible validation in addition to formatting.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "use-method-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-3996E904-03" }, { "topic": "fairness", "source_claim": "A single generic method can be applied identically without local context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use equal evidentiary standards while adapting language, cultural context, affected-community participation, legal sources, and uncertainty to each jurisdiction and population.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-3996E904-04" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "executive-summary-research-template", "title": "Executive Summary: Research Template", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/executive-summary-research-template.md", "source_name": "Executive Summary (Template).md", "source_sha256": "a00cc2ba0b67c3fd53e9f708f5e60142d9c89c9570f294bfebf4da9b778cd9a2", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This document is retained as an executive-summary template. It is reviewed as methodology, not as evidence for any real-world claim or product decision.", "fairness_boundary": "Apply the same source-quality and uncertainty rules across countries and populations while still requiring local-language, legal, cultural, and affected-community context.", "claims": [ { "topic": "scope", "source_claim": "The document functions as a comprehensive report despite having no defined research question or subject.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "A topic-free template is a planning aid only. It cannot establish findings, conclusions, market size, legal status, clinical outcomes, or product requirements.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "retain-as-method-template", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5D4F0662-01" }, { "topic": "examples", "source_claim": "Cross-domain examples and numbers illustrate methods.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Examples are illustrative prompts, not evidence about any specific jurisdiction, population, market, product, or intervention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-illustrative", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5D4F0662-02" }, { "topic": "method", "source_claim": "A structured report format by itself produces reliable research.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Reliability requires a defined question, source hierarchy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, date and jurisdiction scope, conflict handling, and reproducible validation in addition to formatting.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "use-method-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5D4F0662-03" }, { "topic": "fairness", "source_claim": "A single generic method can be applied identically without local context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use equal evidentiary standards while adapting language, cultural context, affected-community participation, legal sources, and uncertainty to each jurisdiction and population.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5D4F0662-04" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "deep-research-plan-unspecified-topic", "title": "Deep Research Plan: Questions, Hypotheses, and Scope Framing", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/deep-research-plan-unspecified-topic.md", "source_name": "Key Research Questions and Hypotheses.md", "source_sha256": "c268a626e5a1091fa1d22f0d653975bac6c82f66efe908f192ad9716cd138720", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This document is retained as a research-plan template without a defined problem. It is reviewed as methodology, not as evidence for any real-world claim or product decision.", "fairness_boundary": "Apply the same source-quality and uncertainty rules across countries and populations while still requiring local-language, legal, cultural, and affected-community context.", "claims": [ { "topic": "scope", "source_claim": "The document functions as a comprehensive report despite having no defined research question or subject.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "A topic-free template is a planning aid only. It cannot establish findings, conclusions, market size, legal status, clinical outcomes, or product requirements.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "retain-as-method-template", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5D04A7D8-01" }, { "topic": "examples", "source_claim": "Cross-domain examples and numbers illustrate methods.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Examples are illustrative prompts, not evidence about any specific jurisdiction, population, market, product, or intervention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-illustrative", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5D04A7D8-02" }, { "topic": "method", "source_claim": "A structured report format by itself produces reliable research.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Reliability requires a defined question, source hierarchy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, date and jurisdiction scope, conflict handling, and reproducible validation in addition to formatting.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "use-method-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5D04A7D8-03" }, { "topic": "fairness", "source_claim": "A single generic method can be applied identically without local context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use equal evidentiary standards while adapting language, cultural context, affected-community participation, legal sources, and uncertainty to each jurisdiction and population.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5D04A7D8-04" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "rapid-deep-research-methodology-and-guidance", "title": "Rapid Deep Research: Methodology and Guidance", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/rapid-deep-research-methodology-and-guidance.md", "source_name": "Rapid Deep Research Methodology and Guidance.md", "source_sha256": "c72118a4557e929962f4a52be99b72581f2d14b3cc21dcc661b2ffac5a477d80", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This document is retained as a rapid-research workflow and quality checklist. It is reviewed as methodology, not as evidence for any real-world claim or product decision.", "fairness_boundary": "Apply the same source-quality and uncertainty rules across countries and populations while still requiring local-language, legal, cultural, and affected-community context.", "claims": [ { "topic": "scope", "source_claim": "The document functions as a comprehensive report despite having no defined research question or subject.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "A topic-free template is a planning aid only. It cannot establish findings, conclusions, market size, legal status, clinical outcomes, or product requirements.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "retain-as-method-template", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5655E82A-01" }, { "topic": "examples", "source_claim": "Cross-domain examples and numbers illustrate methods.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Examples are illustrative prompts, not evidence about any specific jurisdiction, population, market, product, or intervention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-illustrative", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5655E82A-02" }, { "topic": "method", "source_claim": "A structured report format by itself produces reliable research.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Reliability requires a defined question, source hierarchy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, date and jurisdiction scope, conflict handling, and reproducible validation in addition to formatting.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "low", "publication_decision": "use-method-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5655E82A-03" }, { "topic": "fairness", "source_claim": "A single generic method can be applied identically without local context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use equal evidentiary standards while adapting language, cultural context, affected-community participation, legal sources, and uncertainty to each jurisdiction and population.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-5655E82A-04" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "fictional-intelligence-agency-dashboard-website-design", "title": "Fictional Intelligence-Agency Dashboard Website Design", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/fictional-intelligence-agency-dashboard-website-design.md", "source_name": "design for a fictional intelligence-agency dashboard website.md", "source_sha256": "0174321533000f54c55da2112ed44393ef46ef93b00c8b1eef6f669607a42a38", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a fictional dashboard design study. The reviewed synthesis replaces IARPA-like branding with the distinct IARPG identity and separates proposed checks from verified repository evidence.", "fairness_boundary": "No country, agency, disability, diagnosis, language, or cultural group may be used as atmosphere, threat shorthand, or default user model. Public identity must remain plainly fictional and internationally legible.", "claims": [ { "topic": "agency identity", "source_claim": "The name IARPA or an IARPA-like public portal can be treated as a fictional intelligence brand.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "IARPA is a real U.S. Intelligence Community research organization at iarpa.gov and states that it has no operational mission. IARPG must not imitate its name, seal, domain, authority, or official visual identity.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "replace-with-iarpg-brand", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-EBCFDEB1-01" }, { "topic": "fiction boundary", "source_claim": "A government-like visual treatment alone can carry the fictional context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Every public surface must state that IARPG is fictional, not a government service, not affiliated with any agency, and currently a reference publication rather than a live MMO.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-EBCFDEB1-02" }, { "topic": "accessibility", "source_claim": "An automated or black-box audit can establish full accessibility conformance.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "WCAG 2.2 is the current W3C recommendation and requires testable criteria plus human evaluation. Automated structure checks are evidence, not certification or native assistive-technology proof.", "evidence": [ { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-EBCFDEB1-03" }, { "topic": "privacy and child safety", "source_claim": "Mentioning GDPR, COPPA, or age gates establishes legal compliance.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "Compliance depends on actual data flows, audience, jurisdiction, controller/processor roles, and deployment. COPPA addresses U.S. services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge; it is not a universal adult-access rule.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-deployment-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-EBCFDEB1-04" }, { "topic": "usability targets", "source_claim": "Fixed time-to-understand, bounce-rate, or conversion targets are factual usability benchmarks.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Such thresholds are product hypotheses. Validate them with representative first-click, comprehension, accessibility, and task-completion research; do not present them as measured outcomes.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-target", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-EBCFDEB1-05" }, { "topic": "security audit", "source_claim": "A prose black-box assessment proves a live host is secure, private, fast, or reliable.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Security and reliability claims require current host evidence, defined test scope, safe methods, reproducible results, and explicit limitations. Use OWASP ASVS as one verification reference, not as automatic compliance.", "evidence": [ { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-host-evidence", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-EBCFDEB1-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "transmedia-knowledge-architecture-and-educational-content-specification", "title": "Transmedia Knowledge Architecture and Educational Content Specification", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/transmedia-knowledge-architecture-and-educational-content-specification.md", "source_name": "Educational Portal Content Architecture.md", "source_sha256": "21d81effe539d3613bf8bf8b01bac26898f30435de1454d9ed835a5fc09dfa19", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a transmedia and content-architecture proposal. The reviewed synthesis replaces IARPA-like branding with the distinct IARPG identity and separates proposed checks from verified repository evidence.", "fairness_boundary": "No country, agency, disability, diagnosis, language, or cultural group may be used as atmosphere, threat shorthand, or default user model. Public identity must remain plainly fictional and internationally legible.", "claims": [ { "topic": "agency identity", "source_claim": "The name IARPA or an IARPA-like public portal can be treated as a fictional intelligence brand.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "IARPA is a real U.S. Intelligence Community research organization at iarpa.gov and states that it has no operational mission. IARPG must not imitate its name, seal, domain, authority, or official visual identity.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "replace-with-iarpg-brand", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-59320F8B-01" }, { "topic": "fiction boundary", "source_claim": "A government-like visual treatment alone can carry the fictional context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Every public surface must state that IARPG is fictional, not a government service, not affiliated with any agency, and currently a reference publication rather than a live MMO.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-59320F8B-02" }, { "topic": "accessibility", "source_claim": "An automated or black-box audit can establish full accessibility conformance.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "WCAG 2.2 is the current W3C recommendation and requires testable criteria plus human evaluation. Automated structure checks are evidence, not certification or native assistive-technology proof.", "evidence": [ { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-59320F8B-03" }, { "topic": "privacy and child safety", "source_claim": "Mentioning GDPR, COPPA, or age gates establishes legal compliance.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "Compliance depends on actual data flows, audience, jurisdiction, controller/processor roles, and deployment. COPPA addresses U.S. services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge; it is not a universal adult-access rule.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-deployment-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-59320F8B-04" }, { "topic": "usability targets", "source_claim": "Fixed time-to-understand, bounce-rate, or conversion targets are factual usability benchmarks.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Such thresholds are product hypotheses. Validate them with representative first-click, comprehension, accessibility, and task-completion research; do not present them as measured outcomes.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-target", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-59320F8B-05" }, { "topic": "security audit", "source_claim": "A prose black-box assessment proves a live host is secure, private, fast, or reliable.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Security and reliability claims require current host evidence, defined test scope, safe methods, reproducible results, and explicit limitations. Use OWASP ASVS as one verification reference, not as automatic compliance.", "evidence": [ { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-host-evidence", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-59320F8B-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "educational-rpg-portal-audit-plan", "title": "Educational RPG Portal Audit Plan", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/educational-rpg-portal-audit-plan.md", "source_name": "Educational RPG Portal Audit Plan.md", "source_sha256": "b41fc495afbb80bf90edee555be0d2c72699275c90e06a1c63d4cb7bdaa0f570", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as an audit plan rather than evidence that an audit occurred. The reviewed synthesis replaces IARPA-like branding with the distinct IARPG identity and separates proposed checks from verified repository evidence.", "fairness_boundary": "No country, agency, disability, diagnosis, language, or cultural group may be used as atmosphere, threat shorthand, or default user model. Public identity must remain plainly fictional and internationally legible.", "claims": [ { "topic": "agency identity", "source_claim": "The name IARPA or an IARPA-like public portal can be treated as a fictional intelligence brand.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "IARPA is a real U.S. Intelligence Community research organization at iarpa.gov and states that it has no operational mission. IARPG must not imitate its name, seal, domain, authority, or official visual identity.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "replace-with-iarpg-brand", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-BE86C234-01" }, { "topic": "fiction boundary", "source_claim": "A government-like visual treatment alone can carry the fictional context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Every public surface must state that IARPG is fictional, not a government service, not affiliated with any agency, and currently a reference publication rather than a live MMO.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-BE86C234-02" }, { "topic": "accessibility", "source_claim": "An automated or black-box audit can establish full accessibility conformance.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "WCAG 2.2 is the current W3C recommendation and requires testable criteria plus human evaluation. Automated structure checks are evidence, not certification or native assistive-technology proof.", "evidence": [ { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-BE86C234-03" }, { "topic": "privacy and child safety", "source_claim": "Mentioning GDPR, COPPA, or age gates establishes legal compliance.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "Compliance depends on actual data flows, audience, jurisdiction, controller/processor roles, and deployment. COPPA addresses U.S. services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge; it is not a universal adult-access rule.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-deployment-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-BE86C234-04" }, { "topic": "usability targets", "source_claim": "Fixed time-to-understand, bounce-rate, or conversion targets are factual usability benchmarks.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Such thresholds are product hypotheses. Validate them with representative first-click, comprehension, accessibility, and task-completion research; do not present them as measured outcomes.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-target", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-BE86C234-05" }, { "topic": "security audit", "source_claim": "A prose black-box assessment proves a live host is secure, private, fast, or reliable.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Security and reliability claims require current host evidence, defined test scope, safe methods, reproducible results, and explicit limitations. Use OWASP ASVS as one verification reference, not as automatic compliance.", "evidence": [ { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-host-evidence", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-BE86C234-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "strategic-fictional-user-interface-design-for-rpg-dashboard", "title": "Strategic Fictional User Interface Design for an RPG Dashboard", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/strategic-fictional-user-interface-design-for-rpg-dashboard.md", "source_name": "Fictional RPG Dashboard Design.md", "source_sha256": "1b49e866596d01b250f4b51dde700256ccb2c01fb1a31254a5e84c9e5a307d60", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a fictional dashboard UI concept. The reviewed synthesis replaces IARPA-like branding with the distinct IARPG identity and separates proposed checks from verified repository evidence.", "fairness_boundary": "No country, agency, disability, diagnosis, language, or cultural group may be used as atmosphere, threat shorthand, or default user model. Public identity must remain plainly fictional and internationally legible.", "claims": [ { "topic": "agency identity", "source_claim": "The name IARPA or an IARPA-like public portal can be treated as a fictional intelligence brand.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "IARPA is a real U.S. Intelligence Community research organization at iarpa.gov and states that it has no operational mission. IARPG must not imitate its name, seal, domain, authority, or official visual identity.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "replace-with-iarpg-brand", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-03CFCCAE-01" }, { "topic": "fiction boundary", "source_claim": "A government-like visual treatment alone can carry the fictional context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Every public surface must state that IARPG is fictional, not a government service, not affiliated with any agency, and currently a reference publication rather than a live MMO.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-03CFCCAE-02" }, { "topic": "accessibility", "source_claim": "An automated or black-box audit can establish full accessibility conformance.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "WCAG 2.2 is the current W3C recommendation and requires testable criteria plus human evaluation. Automated structure checks are evidence, not certification or native assistive-technology proof.", "evidence": [ { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-03CFCCAE-03" }, { "topic": "privacy and child safety", "source_claim": "Mentioning GDPR, COPPA, or age gates establishes legal compliance.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "Compliance depends on actual data flows, audience, jurisdiction, controller/processor roles, and deployment. COPPA addresses U.S. services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge; it is not a universal adult-access rule.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-deployment-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-03CFCCAE-04" }, { "topic": "usability targets", "source_claim": "Fixed time-to-understand, bounce-rate, or conversion targets are factual usability benchmarks.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Such thresholds are product hypotheses. Validate them with representative first-click, comprehension, accessibility, and task-completion research; do not present them as measured outcomes.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-target", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-03CFCCAE-05" }, { "topic": "security audit", "source_claim": "A prose black-box assessment proves a live host is secure, private, fast, or reliable.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Security and reliability claims require current host evidence, defined test scope, safe methods, reproducible results, and explicit limitations. Use OWASP ASVS as one verification reference, not as automatic compliance.", "evidence": [ { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-host-evidence", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-03CFCCAE-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "fictional-rpg-portal-brand-audit", "title": "Fictional RPG Portal Brand Audit", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/fictional-rpg-portal-brand-audit.md", "source_name": "Fictional RPG Portal Brand Audit.md", "source_sha256": "4c81cf9732c89e89b33351145016f4d5fbaf5a04245d21683999ffb95bf59e17", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a brand-risk and clarity study. The reviewed synthesis replaces IARPA-like branding with the distinct IARPG identity and separates proposed checks from verified repository evidence.", "fairness_boundary": "No country, agency, disability, diagnosis, language, or cultural group may be used as atmosphere, threat shorthand, or default user model. Public identity must remain plainly fictional and internationally legible.", "claims": [ { "topic": "agency identity", "source_claim": "The name IARPA or an IARPA-like public portal can be treated as a fictional intelligence brand.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "IARPA is a real U.S. Intelligence Community research organization at iarpa.gov and states that it has no operational mission. IARPG must not imitate its name, seal, domain, authority, or official visual identity.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "replace-with-iarpg-brand", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7C25E41E-01" }, { "topic": "fiction boundary", "source_claim": "A government-like visual treatment alone can carry the fictional context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Every public surface must state that IARPG is fictional, not a government service, not affiliated with any agency, and currently a reference publication rather than a live MMO.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7C25E41E-02" }, { "topic": "accessibility", "source_claim": "An automated or black-box audit can establish full accessibility conformance.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "WCAG 2.2 is the current W3C recommendation and requires testable criteria plus human evaluation. Automated structure checks are evidence, not certification or native assistive-technology proof.", "evidence": [ { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7C25E41E-03" }, { "topic": "privacy and child safety", "source_claim": "Mentioning GDPR, COPPA, or age gates establishes legal compliance.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "Compliance depends on actual data flows, audience, jurisdiction, controller/processor roles, and deployment. COPPA addresses U.S. services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge; it is not a universal adult-access rule.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-deployment-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7C25E41E-04" }, { "topic": "usability targets", "source_claim": "Fixed time-to-understand, bounce-rate, or conversion targets are factual usability benchmarks.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Such thresholds are product hypotheses. Validate them with representative first-click, comprehension, accessibility, and task-completion research; do not present them as measured outcomes.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-target", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7C25E41E-05" }, { "topic": "security audit", "source_claim": "A prose black-box assessment proves a live host is secure, private, fast, or reliable.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Security and reliability claims require current host evidence, defined test scope, safe methods, reproducible results, and explicit limitations. Use OWASP ASVS as one verification reference, not as automatic compliance.", "evidence": [ { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-host-evidence", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7C25E41E-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "fictional-educational-rpg-portal-product-strategy", "title": "Fictional Educational RPG Portal Product Strategy", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/fictional-educational-rpg-portal-product-strategy.md", "source_name": "Fictional RPG Portal Product Strategy.md", "source_sha256": "c26cc9b02a3145ac6a3f4ff9a3c4863cfae474a49382e3ad2e2aa1a66019e67d", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a product-strategy proposal. The reviewed synthesis replaces IARPA-like branding with the distinct IARPG identity and separates proposed checks from verified repository evidence.", "fairness_boundary": "No country, agency, disability, diagnosis, language, or cultural group may be used as atmosphere, threat shorthand, or default user model. Public identity must remain plainly fictional and internationally legible.", "claims": [ { "topic": "agency identity", "source_claim": "The name IARPA or an IARPA-like public portal can be treated as a fictional intelligence brand.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "IARPA is a real U.S. Intelligence Community research organization at iarpa.gov and states that it has no operational mission. IARPG must not imitate its name, seal, domain, authority, or official visual identity.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "replace-with-iarpg-brand", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-DC288946-01" }, { "topic": "fiction boundary", "source_claim": "A government-like visual treatment alone can carry the fictional context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Every public surface must state that IARPG is fictional, not a government service, not affiliated with any agency, and currently a reference publication rather than a live MMO.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-DC288946-02" }, { "topic": "accessibility", "source_claim": "An automated or black-box audit can establish full accessibility conformance.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "WCAG 2.2 is the current W3C recommendation and requires testable criteria plus human evaluation. Automated structure checks are evidence, not certification or native assistive-technology proof.", "evidence": [ { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-DC288946-03" }, { "topic": "privacy and child safety", "source_claim": "Mentioning GDPR, COPPA, or age gates establishes legal compliance.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "Compliance depends on actual data flows, audience, jurisdiction, controller/processor roles, and deployment. COPPA addresses U.S. services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge; it is not a universal adult-access rule.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-deployment-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-DC288946-04" }, { "topic": "usability targets", "source_claim": "Fixed time-to-understand, bounce-rate, or conversion targets are factual usability benchmarks.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Such thresholds are product hypotheses. Validate them with representative first-click, comprehension, accessibility, and task-completion research; do not present them as measured outcomes.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-target", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-DC288946-05" }, { "topic": "security audit", "source_claim": "A prose black-box assessment proves a live host is secure, private, fast, or reliable.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Security and reliability claims require current host evidence, defined test scope, safe methods, reproducible results, and explicit limitations. Use OWASP ASVS as one verification reference, not as automatic compliance.", "evidence": [ { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-host-evidence", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-DC288946-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "fictional-rpg-portal-strategic-front-door-and-transmedia-architecture", "title": "Fictional RPG Portal: Strategic Front Door and Transmedia Architecture", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/fictional-rpg-portal-strategic-front-door-and-transmedia-architecture.md", "source_name": "Fictional RPG Portal Strategy.md", "source_sha256": "438a645df246360dfc4ba255d8cd4eee56a1db2dbd917e6328d4995eccfc5e65", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a front-door and cross-project architecture proposal. The reviewed synthesis replaces IARPA-like branding with the distinct IARPG identity and separates proposed checks from verified repository evidence.", "fairness_boundary": "No country, agency, disability, diagnosis, language, or cultural group may be used as atmosphere, threat shorthand, or default user model. Public identity must remain plainly fictional and internationally legible.", "claims": [ { "topic": "agency identity", "source_claim": "The name IARPA or an IARPA-like public portal can be treated as a fictional intelligence brand.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "IARPA is a real U.S. Intelligence Community research organization at iarpa.gov and states that it has no operational mission. IARPG must not imitate its name, seal, domain, authority, or official visual identity.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "replace-with-iarpg-brand", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-E3664D5E-01" }, { "topic": "fiction boundary", "source_claim": "A government-like visual treatment alone can carry the fictional context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Every public surface must state that IARPG is fictional, not a government service, not affiliated with any agency, and currently a reference publication rather than a live MMO.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-E3664D5E-02" }, { "topic": "accessibility", "source_claim": "An automated or black-box audit can establish full accessibility conformance.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "WCAG 2.2 is the current W3C recommendation and requires testable criteria plus human evaluation. Automated structure checks are evidence, not certification or native assistive-technology proof.", "evidence": [ { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-E3664D5E-03" }, { "topic": "privacy and child safety", "source_claim": "Mentioning GDPR, COPPA, or age gates establishes legal compliance.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "Compliance depends on actual data flows, audience, jurisdiction, controller/processor roles, and deployment. COPPA addresses U.S. services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge; it is not a universal adult-access rule.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-deployment-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-E3664D5E-04" }, { "topic": "usability targets", "source_claim": "Fixed time-to-understand, bounce-rate, or conversion targets are factual usability benchmarks.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Such thresholds are product hypotheses. Validate them with representative first-click, comprehension, accessibility, and task-completion research; do not present them as measured outcomes.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-target", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-E3664D5E-05" }, { "topic": "security audit", "source_claim": "A prose black-box assessment proves a live host is secure, private, fast, or reliable.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Security and reliability claims require current host evidence, defined test scope, safe methods, reproducible results, and explicit limitations. Use OWASP ASVS as one verification reference, not as automatic compliance.", "evidence": [ { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-host-evidence", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-E3664D5E-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "fictional-rpg-portal-technical-quality-security-privacy-performance-seo-and-reliability-audit", "title": "Fictional RPG Portal Technical Quality, Security, Privacy, Performance, SEO, and Reliability Audit", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/fictional-rpg-portal-technical-quality-security-privacy-performance-seo-and-reliability-audit.md", "source_name": "RPG Portal Technical Audit.md", "source_sha256": "126ec2f3647cba87e28cea42f02f74ed30e1ed80d3d3979c017414b07c322869", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a source-supplied black-box audit narrative whose live-host claims were not independently reproduced. The reviewed synthesis replaces IARPA-like branding with the distinct IARPG identity and separates proposed checks from verified repository evidence.", "fairness_boundary": "No country, agency, disability, diagnosis, language, or cultural group may be used as atmosphere, threat shorthand, or default user model. Public identity must remain plainly fictional and internationally legible.", "claims": [ { "topic": "agency identity", "source_claim": "The name IARPA or an IARPA-like public portal can be treated as a fictional intelligence brand.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "IARPA is a real U.S. Intelligence Community research organization at iarpa.gov and states that it has no operational mission. IARPG must not imitate its name, seal, domain, authority, or official visual identity.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "replace-with-iarpg-brand", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6686E095-01" }, { "topic": "fiction boundary", "source_claim": "A government-like visual treatment alone can carry the fictional context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Every public surface must state that IARPG is fictional, not a government service, not affiliated with any agency, and currently a reference publication rather than a live MMO.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6686E095-02" }, { "topic": "accessibility", "source_claim": "An automated or black-box audit can establish full accessibility conformance.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "WCAG 2.2 is the current W3C recommendation and requires testable criteria plus human evaluation. Automated structure checks are evidence, not certification or native assistive-technology proof.", "evidence": [ { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6686E095-03" }, { "topic": "privacy and child safety", "source_claim": "Mentioning GDPR, COPPA, or age gates establishes legal compliance.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "Compliance depends on actual data flows, audience, jurisdiction, controller/processor roles, and deployment. COPPA addresses U.S. services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge; it is not a universal adult-access rule.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-deployment-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6686E095-04" }, { "topic": "usability targets", "source_claim": "Fixed time-to-understand, bounce-rate, or conversion targets are factual usability benchmarks.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Such thresholds are product hypotheses. Validate them with representative first-click, comprehension, accessibility, and task-completion research; do not present them as measured outcomes.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-target", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6686E095-05" }, { "topic": "security audit", "source_claim": "A prose black-box assessment proves a live host is secure, private, fast, or reliable.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Security and reliability claims require current host evidence, defined test scope, safe methods, reproducible results, and explicit limitations. Use OWASP ASVS as one verification reference, not as automatic compliance.", "evidence": [ { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-host-evidence", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6686E095-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "public-ux-accessibility-search-mobile-and-cross-project-navigation-audit", "title": "Public UX, Accessibility, Search, Mobile, and Cross-Project Navigation Audit", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/public-ux-accessibility-search-mobile-and-cross-project-navigation-audit.md", "source_name": "UX Accessibility Audit Research Plan.md", "source_sha256": "2b39fea8621d0b36a0abe93c12de7162bd27bce7cda5e59c3badedbf85a0bac7", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a public UX and accessibility research plan with unmeasured target thresholds. The reviewed synthesis replaces IARPA-like branding with the distinct IARPG identity and separates proposed checks from verified repository evidence.", "fairness_boundary": "No country, agency, disability, diagnosis, language, or cultural group may be used as atmosphere, threat shorthand, or default user model. Public identity must remain plainly fictional and internationally legible.", "claims": [ { "topic": "agency identity", "source_claim": "The name IARPA or an IARPA-like public portal can be treated as a fictional intelligence brand.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "IARPA is a real U.S. Intelligence Community research organization at iarpa.gov and states that it has no operational mission. IARPG must not imitate its name, seal, domain, authority, or official visual identity.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "replace-with-iarpg-brand", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-678EE39C-01" }, { "topic": "fiction boundary", "source_claim": "A government-like visual treatment alone can carry the fictional context.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Every public surface must state that IARPG is fictional, not a government service, not affiliated with any agency, and currently a reference publication rather than a live MMO.", "evidence": [ { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-678EE39C-02" }, { "topic": "accessibility", "source_claim": "An automated or black-box audit can establish full accessibility conformance.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "WCAG 2.2 is the current W3C recommendation and requires testable criteria plus human evaluation. Automated structure checks are evidence, not certification or native assistive-technology proof.", "evidence": [ { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-678EE39C-03" }, { "topic": "privacy and child safety", "source_claim": "Mentioning GDPR, COPPA, or age gates establishes legal compliance.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "Compliance depends on actual data flows, audience, jurisdiction, controller/processor roles, and deployment. COPPA addresses U.S. services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge; it is not a universal adult-access rule.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-deployment-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-678EE39C-04" }, { "topic": "usability targets", "source_claim": "Fixed time-to-understand, bounce-rate, or conversion targets are factual usability benchmarks.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Such thresholds are product hypotheses. Validate them with representative first-click, comprehension, accessibility, and task-completion research; do not present them as measured outcomes.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-target", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-678EE39C-05" }, { "topic": "security audit", "source_claim": "A prose black-box assessment proves a live host is secure, private, fast, or reliable.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Security and reliability claims require current host evidence, defined test scope, safe methods, reproducible results, and explicit limitations. Use OWASP ASVS as one verification reference, not as automatic compliance.", "evidence": [ { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-host-evidence", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-678EE39C-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "educational-hospital-rpg-game-design", "title": "Educational Hospital RPG Game Design", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/educational-hospital-rpg-game-design.md", "source_name": "Educational Hospital RPG Game Design.md", "source_sha256": "a39d6364b31af4dd61acbe06d6bf03608b0f57591a6eeb1b5a095b24750c37b6", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a serious-game design exploration for a fictional care setting. Its current publication value is limited to fictional design hypotheses that comply with dignity, non-stigmatization, consent, accessibility, and human-rights boundaries.", "fairness_boundary": "Mental-health services, disability, diagnosis, and care vary across cultures and jurisdictions. Review must include people with lived experience, local terminology, rights law, and service context; no one system is treated as the global norm.", "claims": [ { "topic": "setting and authority", "source_claim": "A fictional hospital environment can be presented as a realistic model of clinical care.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The setting is fictional game design. It is not clinical guidance, diagnosis, treatment, or evidence that a mechanic reflects real care.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-fiction-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6BB4E2F9-01" }, { "topic": "mental health and danger", "source_claim": "Psychosis, diagnosis, hospitalization, or disability can be used as shorthand for criminality, violence, unreliability, or enemy status.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Do not encode diagnosis or disability as guilt, danger, incompetence, deception, or punishment. Character behavior must be individualized and the same evidence and consequence rules must apply to all characters.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "remove-stigmatizing-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6BB4E2F9-02" }, { "topic": "coercion", "source_claim": "Confinement, forced labor, surveillance, loss of rights, or release-by-compliance can be framed as therapeutic realism.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "WHO/OHCHR guidance emphasizes rights, dignity, person-centred community services, and elimination of coercion. Any restrictive game mechanic must be fictional, avoid clinical endorsement, provide agency and appeal, and never be called treatment.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "redesign-before-use", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6BB4E2F9-03" }, { "topic": "clinical guidance", "source_claim": "Specific diagnostic or treatment statements in the source are safe to reuse as game instructions.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Clinical claims require current professional sources and jurisdiction-specific review. NIMH describes coordinated specialty care as standard care for early psychosis; the game must route real-world concerns to qualified help rather than simulate clinical advice.", "evidence": [ { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "do-not-publish-as-medical-advice", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6BB4E2F9-04" }, { "topic": "international fairness", "source_claim": "One institutional model or one country’s care system can stand in for hospitals worldwide.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use culturally and jurisdictionally diverse review, local terminology, disability and service-user perspectives, and explicit uncertainty. Do not universalize U.S., European, carceral, or security-service assumptions.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-local-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6BB4E2F9-05" }, { "topic": "mechanical outcomes", "source_claim": "Proposed progression, economy, instancing, labor, or retention numbers are validated player outcomes.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "All rates, caps, sentence analogues, engagement effects, and economy parameters are simulation inputs until tested. They cannot establish therapeutic benefit, fairness, or retention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-design-parameter", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6BB4E2F9-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "hospital-campaign-design-research", "title": "Hospital Campaign Design Research", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/hospital-campaign-design-research.md", "source_name": "Hospital Campaign Design Research.md", "source_sha256": "08584a156405a02efd17b47768235239e67c8848fbc2b69139a9d2d88b19577b", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a campaign-structure proposal. Its current publication value is limited to fictional design hypotheses that comply with dignity, non-stigmatization, consent, accessibility, and human-rights boundaries.", "fairness_boundary": "Mental-health services, disability, diagnosis, and care vary across cultures and jurisdictions. Review must include people with lived experience, local terminology, rights law, and service context; no one system is treated as the global norm.", "claims": [ { "topic": "setting and authority", "source_claim": "A fictional hospital environment can be presented as a realistic model of clinical care.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The setting is fictional game design. It is not clinical guidance, diagnosis, treatment, or evidence that a mechanic reflects real care.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-fiction-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CB45A90E-01" }, { "topic": "mental health and danger", "source_claim": "Psychosis, diagnosis, hospitalization, or disability can be used as shorthand for criminality, violence, unreliability, or enemy status.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Do not encode diagnosis or disability as guilt, danger, incompetence, deception, or punishment. Character behavior must be individualized and the same evidence and consequence rules must apply to all characters.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "remove-stigmatizing-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CB45A90E-02" }, { "topic": "coercion", "source_claim": "Confinement, forced labor, surveillance, loss of rights, or release-by-compliance can be framed as therapeutic realism.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "WHO/OHCHR guidance emphasizes rights, dignity, person-centred community services, and elimination of coercion. Any restrictive game mechanic must be fictional, avoid clinical endorsement, provide agency and appeal, and never be called treatment.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "redesign-before-use", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CB45A90E-03" }, { "topic": "clinical guidance", "source_claim": "Specific diagnostic or treatment statements in the source are safe to reuse as game instructions.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Clinical claims require current professional sources and jurisdiction-specific review. NIMH describes coordinated specialty care as standard care for early psychosis; the game must route real-world concerns to qualified help rather than simulate clinical advice.", "evidence": [ { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "do-not-publish-as-medical-advice", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CB45A90E-04" }, { "topic": "international fairness", "source_claim": "One institutional model or one country’s care system can stand in for hospitals worldwide.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use culturally and jurisdictionally diverse review, local terminology, disability and service-user perspectives, and explicit uncertainty. Do not universalize U.S., European, carceral, or security-service assumptions.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-local-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CB45A90E-05" }, { "topic": "mechanical outcomes", "source_claim": "Proposed progression, economy, instancing, labor, or retention numbers are validated player outcomes.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "All rates, caps, sentence analogues, engagement effects, and economy parameters are simulation inputs until tested. They cannot establish therapeutic benefit, fairness, or retention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-design-parameter", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CB45A90E-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "hospital-instancing-specification", "title": "Hospital Instancing Specification", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/hospital-instancing-specification.md", "source_name": "Hospital Instancing Specification.md", "source_sha256": "8ca654dc486dffa0dd514fb9e248811fab292971fce9686964d25536bcd0d556", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as an instancing and session-design proposal. Its current publication value is limited to fictional design hypotheses that comply with dignity, non-stigmatization, consent, accessibility, and human-rights boundaries.", "fairness_boundary": "Mental-health services, disability, diagnosis, and care vary across cultures and jurisdictions. Review must include people with lived experience, local terminology, rights law, and service context; no one system is treated as the global norm.", "claims": [ { "topic": "setting and authority", "source_claim": "A fictional hospital environment can be presented as a realistic model of clinical care.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The setting is fictional game design. It is not clinical guidance, diagnosis, treatment, or evidence that a mechanic reflects real care.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-fiction-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-98E57891-01" }, { "topic": "mental health and danger", "source_claim": "Psychosis, diagnosis, hospitalization, or disability can be used as shorthand for criminality, violence, unreliability, or enemy status.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Do not encode diagnosis or disability as guilt, danger, incompetence, deception, or punishment. Character behavior must be individualized and the same evidence and consequence rules must apply to all characters.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "remove-stigmatizing-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-98E57891-02" }, { "topic": "coercion", "source_claim": "Confinement, forced labor, surveillance, loss of rights, or release-by-compliance can be framed as therapeutic realism.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "WHO/OHCHR guidance emphasizes rights, dignity, person-centred community services, and elimination of coercion. Any restrictive game mechanic must be fictional, avoid clinical endorsement, provide agency and appeal, and never be called treatment.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "redesign-before-use", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-98E57891-03" }, { "topic": "clinical guidance", "source_claim": "Specific diagnostic or treatment statements in the source are safe to reuse as game instructions.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Clinical claims require current professional sources and jurisdiction-specific review. NIMH describes coordinated specialty care as standard care for early psychosis; the game must route real-world concerns to qualified help rather than simulate clinical advice.", "evidence": [ { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "do-not-publish-as-medical-advice", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-98E57891-04" }, { "topic": "international fairness", "source_claim": "One institutional model or one country’s care system can stand in for hospitals worldwide.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use culturally and jurisdictionally diverse review, local terminology, disability and service-user perspectives, and explicit uncertainty. Do not universalize U.S., European, carceral, or security-service assumptions.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-local-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-98E57891-05" }, { "topic": "mechanical outcomes", "source_claim": "Proposed progression, economy, instancing, labor, or retention numbers are validated player outcomes.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "All rates, caps, sentence analogues, engagement effects, and economy parameters are simulation inputs until tested. They cannot establish therapeutic benefit, fairness, or retention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-design-parameter", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-98E57891-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "hospital-narrative-game-design", "title": "Hospital Narrative Game Design", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/hospital-narrative-game-design.md", "source_name": "Hospital Narrative Game Design.md", "source_sha256": "a3b2cfd7ec82e86e8d903a3970d3071503f19f820b47752a4a5fa904f68a5a53", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a narrative design study containing clinical and cultural claims that require careful boundaries. Its current publication value is limited to fictional design hypotheses that comply with dignity, non-stigmatization, consent, accessibility, and human-rights boundaries.", "fairness_boundary": "Mental-health services, disability, diagnosis, and care vary across cultures and jurisdictions. Review must include people with lived experience, local terminology, rights law, and service context; no one system is treated as the global norm.", "claims": [ { "topic": "setting and authority", "source_claim": "A fictional hospital environment can be presented as a realistic model of clinical care.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The setting is fictional game design. It is not clinical guidance, diagnosis, treatment, or evidence that a mechanic reflects real care.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-fiction-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7AC077C9-01" }, { "topic": "mental health and danger", "source_claim": "Psychosis, diagnosis, hospitalization, or disability can be used as shorthand for criminality, violence, unreliability, or enemy status.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Do not encode diagnosis or disability as guilt, danger, incompetence, deception, or punishment. Character behavior must be individualized and the same evidence and consequence rules must apply to all characters.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "remove-stigmatizing-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7AC077C9-02" }, { "topic": "coercion", "source_claim": "Confinement, forced labor, surveillance, loss of rights, or release-by-compliance can be framed as therapeutic realism.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "WHO/OHCHR guidance emphasizes rights, dignity, person-centred community services, and elimination of coercion. Any restrictive game mechanic must be fictional, avoid clinical endorsement, provide agency and appeal, and never be called treatment.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "redesign-before-use", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7AC077C9-03" }, { "topic": "clinical guidance", "source_claim": "Specific diagnostic or treatment statements in the source are safe to reuse as game instructions.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Clinical claims require current professional sources and jurisdiction-specific review. NIMH describes coordinated specialty care as standard care for early psychosis; the game must route real-world concerns to qualified help rather than simulate clinical advice.", "evidence": [ { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "do-not-publish-as-medical-advice", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7AC077C9-04" }, { "topic": "international fairness", "source_claim": "One institutional model or one country’s care system can stand in for hospitals worldwide.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use culturally and jurisdictionally diverse review, local terminology, disability and service-user perspectives, and explicit uncertainty. Do not universalize U.S., European, carceral, or security-service assumptions.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-local-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7AC077C9-05" }, { "topic": "mechanical outcomes", "source_claim": "Proposed progression, economy, instancing, labor, or retention numbers are validated player outcomes.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "All rates, caps, sentence analogues, engagement effects, and economy parameters are simulation inputs until tested. They cannot establish therapeutic benefit, fairness, or retention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-design-parameter", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-7AC077C9-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "hospital-parity-audit", "title": "Hospital Parity Audit", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/hospital-parity-audit.md", "source_name": "Hospital Parity Audit.md", "source_sha256": "d345c6428e44fa6009e44140da8b7c7928592904b250ecfb1d0600414779f802", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a parity checklist, not a measured equality result. Its current publication value is limited to fictional design hypotheses that comply with dignity, non-stigmatization, consent, accessibility, and human-rights boundaries.", "fairness_boundary": "Mental-health services, disability, diagnosis, and care vary across cultures and jurisdictions. Review must include people with lived experience, local terminology, rights law, and service context; no one system is treated as the global norm.", "claims": [ { "topic": "setting and authority", "source_claim": "A fictional hospital environment can be presented as a realistic model of clinical care.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The setting is fictional game design. It is not clinical guidance, diagnosis, treatment, or evidence that a mechanic reflects real care.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-fiction-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C7BD12A5-01" }, { "topic": "mental health and danger", "source_claim": "Psychosis, diagnosis, hospitalization, or disability can be used as shorthand for criminality, violence, unreliability, or enemy status.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Do not encode diagnosis or disability as guilt, danger, incompetence, deception, or punishment. Character behavior must be individualized and the same evidence and consequence rules must apply to all characters.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "remove-stigmatizing-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C7BD12A5-02" }, { "topic": "coercion", "source_claim": "Confinement, forced labor, surveillance, loss of rights, or release-by-compliance can be framed as therapeutic realism.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "WHO/OHCHR guidance emphasizes rights, dignity, person-centred community services, and elimination of coercion. Any restrictive game mechanic must be fictional, avoid clinical endorsement, provide agency and appeal, and never be called treatment.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "redesign-before-use", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C7BD12A5-03" }, { "topic": "clinical guidance", "source_claim": "Specific diagnostic or treatment statements in the source are safe to reuse as game instructions.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Clinical claims require current professional sources and jurisdiction-specific review. NIMH describes coordinated specialty care as standard care for early psychosis; the game must route real-world concerns to qualified help rather than simulate clinical advice.", "evidence": [ { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "do-not-publish-as-medical-advice", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C7BD12A5-04" }, { "topic": "international fairness", "source_claim": "One institutional model or one country’s care system can stand in for hospitals worldwide.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use culturally and jurisdictionally diverse review, local terminology, disability and service-user perspectives, and explicit uncertainty. Do not universalize U.S., European, carceral, or security-service assumptions.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-local-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C7BD12A5-05" }, { "topic": "mechanical outcomes", "source_claim": "Proposed progression, economy, instancing, labor, or retention numbers are validated player outcomes.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "All rates, caps, sentence analogues, engagement effects, and economy parameters are simulation inputs until tested. They cannot establish therapeutic benefit, fairness, or retention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-design-parameter", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C7BD12A5-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "rpg-hospital-level-design-analysis", "title": "RPG Hospital Level Design Analysis", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/rpg-hospital-level-design-analysis.md", "source_name": "RPG Hospital Level Design Analysis.md", "source_sha256": "83c1eb9bd3baac2e0acd0bf44416d1bf3c0ad5a43bd7cd6924becd05d9a10dc7", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a level-design analysis. Its current publication value is limited to fictional design hypotheses that comply with dignity, non-stigmatization, consent, accessibility, and human-rights boundaries.", "fairness_boundary": "Mental-health services, disability, diagnosis, and care vary across cultures and jurisdictions. Review must include people with lived experience, local terminology, rights law, and service context; no one system is treated as the global norm.", "claims": [ { "topic": "setting and authority", "source_claim": "A fictional hospital environment can be presented as a realistic model of clinical care.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The setting is fictional game design. It is not clinical guidance, diagnosis, treatment, or evidence that a mechanic reflects real care.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-fiction-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6024834C-01" }, { "topic": "mental health and danger", "source_claim": "Psychosis, diagnosis, hospitalization, or disability can be used as shorthand for criminality, violence, unreliability, or enemy status.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Do not encode diagnosis or disability as guilt, danger, incompetence, deception, or punishment. Character behavior must be individualized and the same evidence and consequence rules must apply to all characters.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "remove-stigmatizing-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6024834C-02" }, { "topic": "coercion", "source_claim": "Confinement, forced labor, surveillance, loss of rights, or release-by-compliance can be framed as therapeutic realism.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "WHO/OHCHR guidance emphasizes rights, dignity, person-centred community services, and elimination of coercion. Any restrictive game mechanic must be fictional, avoid clinical endorsement, provide agency and appeal, and never be called treatment.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "redesign-before-use", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6024834C-03" }, { "topic": "clinical guidance", "source_claim": "Specific diagnostic or treatment statements in the source are safe to reuse as game instructions.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Clinical claims require current professional sources and jurisdiction-specific review. NIMH describes coordinated specialty care as standard care for early psychosis; the game must route real-world concerns to qualified help rather than simulate clinical advice.", "evidence": [ { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "do-not-publish-as-medical-advice", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6024834C-04" }, { "topic": "international fairness", "source_claim": "One institutional model or one country’s care system can stand in for hospitals worldwide.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Use culturally and jurisdictionally diverse review, local terminology, disability and service-user perspectives, and explicit uncertainty. Do not universalize U.S., European, carceral, or security-service assumptions.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-local-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6024834C-05" }, { "topic": "mechanical outcomes", "source_claim": "Proposed progression, economy, instancing, labor, or retention numbers are validated player outcomes.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "All rates, caps, sentence analogues, engagement effects, and economy parameters are simulation inputs until tested. They cannot establish therapeutic benefit, fairness, or retention.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-design-parameter", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6024834C-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "virtual-hospital-economy-design-governance-and-risk-management", "title": "Virtual Hospital Economy: Design, Governance, and Risk Management", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/virtual-hospital-economy-design-governance-and-risk-management.md", "source_name": "Virtual Hospital Economy Design, Governance, and Risk Management.md", "source_sha256": "e605a54d0f962d3e5cac8230b6d43c994e2018926fb2b23a91709feb72943325", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a closed-loop economy and governance proposal. Its current publication value is limited to fictional design hypotheses that comply with dignity, non-stigmatization, consent, accessibility, and human-rights boundaries.", "fairness_boundary": "Mental-health services, disability, diagnosis, and care vary across cultures and jurisdictions. Review must include people with lived experience, local terminology, rights law, and service context; no one system is treated as the global norm.", "claims": [ { "topic": "economic status", "source_claim": "The proposed currencies, exchange rates, sinks, and progression thresholds are validated economic facts.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "They are simulation parameters. Publish units, assumptions, sensitivity ranges, cohort effects, and rollback criteria before implementation.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-design-parameter", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-14BF57E2-01" }, { "topic": "care and progression", "source_claim": "Institutional credits, merits, labor, or “release” can safely mirror treatment or discharge.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Do not equate care, liberty, diagnosis, or discharge with obedience, labor, wealth, or reputation. Use clearly fictional progression language and preserve player agency, appeal, and accessibility.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "redesign-before-use", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-14BF57E2-02" }, { "topic": "real money", "source_claim": "The design supports monetized or transferable real-world value.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The reviewed IARPG direction is closed-loop, non-crypto, non-RMT, and non-pay-to-win. Any future monetization requires a separate legal, consumer-protection, and platform review.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "retain-no-rmt-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-14BF57E2-03" }, { "topic": "governance", "source_claim": "Community votes or reputation scores are sufficient safeguards against abuse.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Governance requires transparent rules, conflict-of-interest controls, anti-collusion measures, accessible reporting, human moderation, appeals, and auditable reversals.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-governance-controls", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-14BF57E2-04" }, { "topic": "simulation evidence", "source_claim": "Agent-based simulation proves real players will perceive the economy as fair or enjoyable.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Simulation can expose instability and exploits but cannot prove comprehension, dignity, fun, trust, or retention; representative human testing remains required.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "retain-evidence-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-14BF57E2-05" }, { "topic": "international fairness", "source_claim": "One cost of time, labor, or access affects all players equally.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Audit timezone, disability, language, connectivity, regional purchasing power, caregiving, and play-session constraints. Avoid mechanics that punish players for real-world circumstance.", "evidence": [ { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-cohort-audit", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-14BF57E2-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "persistent-hospital-micro-economy-design-and-simulation-analysis", "title": "Persistent Hospital Micro-Economy Design and Simulation Analysis", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/persistent-hospital-micro-economy-design-and-simulation-analysis.md", "source_name": "Virtual Hospital Economy Design.md", "source_sha256": "08de508decc435ab10d1e9e87cf418fd18cb382d28b39c00f370355f16cbacd6", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a simulation-oriented micro-economy proposal. Its current publication value is limited to fictional design hypotheses that comply with dignity, non-stigmatization, consent, accessibility, and human-rights boundaries.", "fairness_boundary": "Mental-health services, disability, diagnosis, and care vary across cultures and jurisdictions. Review must include people with lived experience, local terminology, rights law, and service context; no one system is treated as the global norm.", "claims": [ { "topic": "economic status", "source_claim": "The proposed currencies, exchange rates, sinks, and progression thresholds are validated economic facts.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "They are simulation parameters. Publish units, assumptions, sensitivity ranges, cohort effects, and rollback criteria before implementation.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "label-as-design-parameter", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-340534FE-01" }, { "topic": "care and progression", "source_claim": "Institutional credits, merits, labor, or “release” can safely mirror treatment or discharge.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Do not equate care, liberty, diagnosis, or discharge with obedience, labor, wealth, or reputation. Use clearly fictional progression language and preserve player agency, appeal, and accessibility.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "redesign-before-use", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-340534FE-02" }, { "topic": "real money", "source_claim": "The design supports monetized or transferable real-world value.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The reviewed IARPG direction is closed-loop, non-crypto, non-RMT, and non-pay-to-win. Any future monetization requires a separate legal, consumer-protection, and platform review.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "retain-no-rmt-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-340534FE-03" }, { "topic": "governance", "source_claim": "Community votes or reputation scores are sufficient safeguards against abuse.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Governance requires transparent rules, conflict-of-interest controls, anti-collusion measures, accessible reporting, human moderation, appeals, and auditable reversals.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-governance-controls", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-340534FE-04" }, { "topic": "simulation evidence", "source_claim": "Agent-based simulation proves real players will perceive the economy as fair or enjoyable.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Simulation can expose instability and exploits but cannot prove comprehension, dignity, fun, trust, or retention; representative human testing remains required.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "retain-evidence-boundary", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-340534FE-05" }, { "topic": "international fairness", "source_claim": "One cost of time, labor, or access affects all players equally.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Audit timezone, disability, language, connectivity, regional purchasing power, caregiving, and play-session constraints. Avoid mechanics that punish players for real-world circumstance.", "evidence": [ { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-cohort-audit", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-340534FE-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "architectural-realism-in-adult-role-playing-game-design", "title": "Architectural Realism in Adult Role-Playing Game Design", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/architectural-realism-in-adult-role-playing-game-design.md", "source_name": "NPC Character Realism Review.md", "source_sha256": "19d17d5ad499c6b2b1113575400c81dac2f61b939fa4531d5015a6e8d34d219f", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as an adult-audience realism analysis. The reviewed synthesis requires explicit synthetic-identity disclosure, affirmative and revocable consent, data minimization, adult-only boundaries where relevant, and non-stigmatizing character design.", "fairness_boundary": "Age, consent, privacy, and acceptable-content rules vary by jurisdiction and platform. The same dignity and disclosure standards apply across nationality, gender, sexuality, disability, religion, and culture; no group is a default risk category.", "claims": [ { "topic": "adult scope", "source_claim": "“Adult” is a universal legal age and one age-gating method satisfies every market.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "For IARPG research, adult-facing means 18+ as a conservative product boundary, but legal ages and duties vary. Any launch requires jurisdiction-specific counsel and platform-policy review.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" }, { "title": "Ofcom — Highly effective age assurance duties", "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online" }, { "title": "European Commission — EU approach to age verification", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-age-verification" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-jurisdiction-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-31EDC5AA-01" }, { "topic": "child privacy", "source_claim": "COPPA is a general age-verification law for all adult content.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "COPPA governs certain U.S. online services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge of collection from children under 13. It does not by itself define a global adult-content gate.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-31EDC5AA-02" }, { "topic": "age assurance", "source_claim": "The EU mini-wallet or UK age checks are universal, final, and interchangeable.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The EU provides a privacy-preserving age-verification blueprint and evolving scheme; UK duties are service- and risk-specific. Treat both as jurisdictional examples, not universal deployment instructions.", "evidence": [ { "title": "European Commission — EU approach to age verification", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-age-verification" }, { "title": "Ofcom — Highly effective age assurance duties", "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-current-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-31EDC5AA-03" }, { "topic": "AI identity and consent", "source_claim": "Realism is improved when players cannot tell whether a participant is AI or human.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Synthetic characters must be clearly identifiable at material interaction points. Consent must be specific, revocable, and separate from general terms; do not hide AI identity to increase intimacy or disclosure.", "evidence": [ { "title": "European Commission — AI Act application timeline", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai" }, { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-ai-disclosure", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-31EDC5AA-04" }, { "topic": "data and manipulation", "source_claim": "Emotion, voice, gaze, or intimate disclosures can be collected to improve realism without a separate boundary.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Minimize data, avoid covert biometric or emotional inference, disclose processing, and do not use engagement optimization to pressure intimate disclosure or continued interaction.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "prohibit-covert-processing", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-31EDC5AA-05" }, { "topic": "mental-health representation", "source_claim": "Diagnosis or psychiatric traits are reliable shortcuts for adult NPC depth, instability, or danger.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Write individual biography, motives, relationships, culture, and behavior without diagnostic typecasting. Mental-health content requires dignity and affected-community review.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "remove-stigmatizing-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-31EDC5AA-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "npc-design-and-narrative-framework", "title": "NPC Design and Narrative Framework", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/npc-design-and-narrative-framework.md", "source_name": "NPC Design and Narrative Framework.md", "source_sha256": "f1386e8bca87834ac1d57f5efd5f13dd0b1f1fefd262ce088b0ccb5f6d847aca", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as an NPC narrative and behavior framework. The reviewed synthesis requires explicit synthetic-identity disclosure, affirmative and revocable consent, data minimization, adult-only boundaries where relevant, and non-stigmatizing character design.", "fairness_boundary": "Age, consent, privacy, and acceptable-content rules vary by jurisdiction and platform. The same dignity and disclosure standards apply across nationality, gender, sexuality, disability, religion, and culture; no group is a default risk category.", "claims": [ { "topic": "adult scope", "source_claim": "“Adult” is a universal legal age and one age-gating method satisfies every market.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "For IARPG research, adult-facing means 18+ as a conservative product boundary, but legal ages and duties vary. Any launch requires jurisdiction-specific counsel and platform-policy review.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" }, { "title": "Ofcom — Highly effective age assurance duties", "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online" }, { "title": "European Commission — EU approach to age verification", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-age-verification" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-jurisdiction-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C2720E0E-01" }, { "topic": "child privacy", "source_claim": "COPPA is a general age-verification law for all adult content.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "COPPA governs certain U.S. online services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge of collection from children under 13. It does not by itself define a global adult-content gate.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C2720E0E-02" }, { "topic": "age assurance", "source_claim": "The EU mini-wallet or UK age checks are universal, final, and interchangeable.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The EU provides a privacy-preserving age-verification blueprint and evolving scheme; UK duties are service- and risk-specific. Treat both as jurisdictional examples, not universal deployment instructions.", "evidence": [ { "title": "European Commission — EU approach to age verification", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-age-verification" }, { "title": "Ofcom — Highly effective age assurance duties", "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-current-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C2720E0E-03" }, { "topic": "AI identity and consent", "source_claim": "Realism is improved when players cannot tell whether a participant is AI or human.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Synthetic characters must be clearly identifiable at material interaction points. Consent must be specific, revocable, and separate from general terms; do not hide AI identity to increase intimacy or disclosure.", "evidence": [ { "title": "European Commission — AI Act application timeline", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai" }, { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-ai-disclosure", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C2720E0E-04" }, { "topic": "data and manipulation", "source_claim": "Emotion, voice, gaze, or intimate disclosures can be collected to improve realism without a separate boundary.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Minimize data, avoid covert biometric or emotional inference, disclose processing, and do not use engagement optimization to pressure intimate disclosure or continued interaction.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "prohibit-covert-processing", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C2720E0E-05" }, { "topic": "mental-health representation", "source_claim": "Diagnosis or psychiatric traits are reliable shortcuts for adult NPC depth, instability, or danger.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Write individual biography, motives, relationships, culture, and behavior without diagnostic typecasting. Mental-health content requires dignity and affected-community review.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "remove-stigmatizing-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-C2720E0E-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "realism-analysis-of-adult-npc-characters", "title": "Realism Analysis of Adult NPC Characters", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/realism-analysis-of-adult-npc-characters.md", "source_name": "Realism Analysis of Adult NPC Characters.md", "source_sha256": "625fdbfad1882559cf5f758c114350b3085846d1a22c91ee677de48d72730b50", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as an adult-character realism study. The reviewed synthesis requires explicit synthetic-identity disclosure, affirmative and revocable consent, data minimization, adult-only boundaries where relevant, and non-stigmatizing character design.", "fairness_boundary": "Age, consent, privacy, and acceptable-content rules vary by jurisdiction and platform. The same dignity and disclosure standards apply across nationality, gender, sexuality, disability, religion, and culture; no group is a default risk category.", "claims": [ { "topic": "adult scope", "source_claim": "“Adult” is a universal legal age and one age-gating method satisfies every market.", "disposition": "jurisdiction-dependent", "corrected_statement": "For IARPG research, adult-facing means 18+ as a conservative product boundary, but legal ages and duties vary. Any launch requires jurisdiction-specific counsel and platform-policy review.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" }, { "title": "Ofcom — Highly effective age assurance duties", "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online" }, { "title": "European Commission — EU approach to age verification", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-age-verification" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-jurisdiction-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-F6F4AB7F-01" }, { "topic": "child privacy", "source_claim": "COPPA is a general age-verification law for all adult content.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "COPPA governs certain U.S. online services directed to children under 13 or with actual knowledge of collection from children under 13. It does not by itself define a global adult-content gate.", "evidence": [ { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-F6F4AB7F-02" }, { "topic": "age assurance", "source_claim": "The EU mini-wallet or UK age checks are universal, final, and interchangeable.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The EU provides a privacy-preserving age-verification blueprint and evolving scheme; UK duties are service- and risk-specific. Treat both as jurisdictional examples, not universal deployment instructions.", "evidence": [ { "title": "European Commission — EU approach to age verification", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-age-verification" }, { "title": "Ofcom — Highly effective age assurance duties", "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-current-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-F6F4AB7F-03" }, { "topic": "AI identity and consent", "source_claim": "Realism is improved when players cannot tell whether a participant is AI or human.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Synthetic characters must be clearly identifiable at material interaction points. Consent must be specific, revocable, and separate from general terms; do not hide AI identity to increase intimacy or disclosure.", "evidence": [ { "title": "European Commission — AI Act application timeline", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai" }, { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "require-ai-disclosure", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-F6F4AB7F-04" }, { "topic": "data and manipulation", "source_claim": "Emotion, voice, gaze, or intimate disclosures can be collected to improve realism without a separate boundary.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Minimize data, avoid covert biometric or emotional inference, disclose processing, and do not use engagement optimization to pressure intimate disclosure or continued interaction.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "prohibit-covert-processing", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-F6F4AB7F-05" }, { "topic": "mental-health representation", "source_claim": "Diagnosis or psychiatric traits are reliable shortcuts for adult NPC depth, instability, or danger.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Write individual biography, motives, relationships, culture, and behavior without diagnostic typecasting. Mental-health content requires dignity and affected-community review.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "remove-stigmatizing-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-F6F4AB7F-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "mmo-instancing-architecture-design", "title": "MMO Instancing Architecture Design", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/mmo-instancing-architecture-design.md", "source_name": "MMO Instancing Architecture Design.md", "source_sha256": "0a7712ac7b3fbc49185869f3bf7f622727c499902e6df33c6698292352875759", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "This report is retained as a menu of MMO instancing patterns. It does not establish a production architecture, capacity result, or clinical simulation claim.", "fairness_boundary": "Regional infrastructure planning must avoid a single-market default and must consider language, accessibility, connectivity, moderation, latency, data governance, and equitable service quality.", "claims": [ { "topic": "architecture", "source_claim": "A proposed instancing topology is proven optimal for the current IARPG implementation.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Treat shard size, persistence, replication, queueing, and handoff patterns as architecture options until load-tested against a defined engine, traffic model, failure budget, and privacy boundary.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "retain-as-options", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6FF7D97C-01" }, { "topic": "performance", "source_claim": "Latency, concurrency, and capacity values in the source are measured production results.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "No current production MMO host or engine exists in this repository. Numeric capacity and latency values are test targets only.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "label-as-target", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6FF7D97C-02" }, { "topic": "hospital setting", "source_claim": "Instancing choices establish clinical realism or acceptable care practice.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "Instancing is a game-systems decision and cannot validate clinical, legal, or ethical claims about real hospitals.", "evidence": [ { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "separate-game-and-clinical-domains", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6FF7D97C-03" }, { "topic": "privacy", "source_claim": "Instance isolation automatically provides privacy and security.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Isolation must be enforced and tested at identity, authorization, data, logging, spectator, moderation, and cross-instance state boundaries.", "evidence": [ { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-implementation-evidence", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6FF7D97C-04" }, { "topic": "fairness", "source_claim": "A single regional infrastructure pattern is globally neutral.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Plan for latency, language, moderation capacity, accessibility, data residency, and degraded connectivity across regions without assigning lower-quality play to particular countries.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "require-regional-equity-review", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-6FF7D97C-05" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "adaptive-risk-based-ai-governance-research", "title": "AI Governance: Risk-Based, Adaptive, and International Policy Frameworks", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/adaptive-risk-based-ai-governance-research.md", "source_name": "AI governance is rapidly evolving as governments.md", "source_sha256": "8afd655f46ef68849061a77674dd585a26be7d2cae6e593bc5066b550bd44c7d", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "The report remains useful as a comparative governance map, but its current synthesis corrects the United States policy timeline, distinguishes binding law from voluntary guidance, removes unverified adoption and market numbers, and rejects reductive country typologies.", "fairness_boundary": "Compare jurisdictions by instrument, scope, legal effect, institutions, enforcement, rights, implementation evidence, and uncertainty. Do not reduce the EU to “regulation,” the United States to “innovation,” China to “control,” or any region to a moral type.", "claims": [ { "topic": "EU AI Act", "source_claim": "The Act was enacted in June 2024 and its high-risk obligations can be discussed as uniformly current.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 entered into force on 1 August 2024. Application is phased: prohibited practices and AI-literacy duties from 2 February 2025, GPAI governance obligations from 2 August 2025, general application from 2 August 2026, and later dates for specified high-risk systems under the current implementation timeline.", "evidence": [ { "title": "European Commission — AI Act application timeline", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-1BD53C7A-01" }, { "topic": "United States federal policy", "source_claim": "Executive Order 14110 remains the controlling current federal AI policy.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Executive Order 14110 was listed for rescission on 20 January 2025. Executive Order 14179 of 23 January 2025 and the later America’s AI Action Plan reflect the current administration’s federal direction; agency, statutory, and state requirements still need separate review.", "evidence": [ { "title": "White House — Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions", "url": "https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/initial-rescissions-of-harmful-executive-orders-and-actions/" }, { "title": "White House — Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/removing-barriers-to-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-1BD53C7A-02" }, { "topic": "NIST AI RMF", "source_claim": "NIST AI RMF is a binding U.S. compliance standard.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "AI RMF 1.0 is voluntary, rights-preserving, non-sector-specific guidance and NIST states that it is being revised. Sector-specific legal duties are separate.", "evidence": [ { "title": "NIST — AI Risk Management Framework 1.0", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-1BD53C7A-03" }, { "topic": "international instruments", "source_claim": "UNESCO and Council of Europe instruments have the same legal force.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "UNESCO’s 2021 Recommendation is a global normative ethics instrument. The Council of Europe Framework Convention is a treaty framework whose legal effect depends on signature, ratification, domestic implementation, and applicable reservations.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" }, { "title": "Council of Europe — Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-1BD53C7A-04" }, { "topic": "market and adoption numbers", "source_claim": "The source’s 2024–2026 investment, adoption, device, and regulation counts are current and comparable.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Do not publish the supplied market, adoption, investment, or device counts without dated primary datasets and consistent definitions. They are excluded from the reviewed synthesis.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "omit-unverified-numbers", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-1BD53C7A-05" }, { "topic": "comparative framing", "source_claim": "National approaches can be summarized as stable cultural preferences.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Treat governance as changing institutional arrangements, not national character. Include enforcement capacity, rights impacts, affected communities, internal disagreement, subnational law, and implementation evidence.", "evidence": [ { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" }, { "title": "Council of Europe — Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-1BD53C7A-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "colibri-lightweight-mixture-of-experts-runtime-analysis", "title": "Colibri: Lightweight Mixture-of-Experts Runtime Architecture and Compatibility Analysis", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/colibri-lightweight-mixture-of-experts-runtime-analysis.md", "source_name": "Colibri is an open‐source, lightweight Mixture‐of‐Experts.md", "source_sha256": "d1633429f04e18494de4b03c2d23df5f0881b8c7ba79d56405a1981c6e570a68", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "The current synthesis verifies the public Colibri repository’s stated architecture and commands, separates project claims from independent results, and does not claim TinyRustLM interoperability without a tested converter and matching model architecture.", "fairness_boundary": "Hardware recommendations must state whose machine, operating system, storage, energy, accessibility, and cost assumptions they use. “Consumer hardware” is not globally uniform, and low-resource deployment claims must not hide storage or power requirements.", "claims": [ { "topic": "project identity", "source_claim": "Colibri is a generic MoE runtime supporting arbitrary models.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The official repository presents Colibri as a GLM-5.2-specific runtime that streams routed experts from disk; do not generalize support to unrelated architectures without upstream evidence and tests.", "evidence": [ { "title": "JustVugg/colibri — official repository and documentation", "url": "https://github.com/JustVugg/colibri" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-8557A53B-01" }, { "topic": "memory floor", "source_claim": "A 744B model objectively runs on any 25 GB consumer machine.", "disposition": "self-reported", "corrected_statement": "The repository claims a demonstrated 25 GB-RAM floor on its development machine. Treat this as an upstream, hardware-specific project result, not an independently reproduced universal requirement.", "evidence": [ { "title": "JustVugg/colibri — official repository and documentation", "url": "https://github.com/JustVugg/colibri" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-8557A53B-02" }, { "topic": "performance", "source_claim": "Cold and warm token rates are expected performance for users.", "disposition": "self-reported", "corrected_statement": "All throughput and TTFT values are upstream or community datapoints tied to exact hardware, cache residency, quantization, and software revision. Benchmark the intended deployment independently.", "evidence": [ { "title": "JustVugg/colibri — official repository and documentation", "url": "https://github.com/JustVugg/colibri" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-8557A53B-03" }, { "topic": "runtime dependencies", "source_claim": "The complete product has zero dependencies.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "The inference runtime path is described as pure C; conversion and optional gateways/backends have additional tooling and dependencies. State the boundary precisely.", "evidence": [ { "title": "JustVugg/colibri — official repository and documentation", "url": "https://github.com/JustVugg/colibri" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-8557A53B-04" }, { "topic": "TinyRustLM compatibility", "source_claim": "TinyRustLM .slm models can be converted to Colibri with routine reformatting.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "TinyRustLM publishes a browser-local .slm workflow. No tested, authoritative converter or architecture-equivalence proof was found. Treat the formats as incompatible until a reproducible converter and model-level validation exist.", "evidence": [ { "title": "TinyRustLM — browser-local runtime publication", "url": "https://tinyrustlm.com/" }, { "title": "MiRust — TinyRustLM technical guides", "url": "https://mirust.com/guides/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-8557A53B-05" }, { "topic": "production readiness", "source_claim": "An exposed OpenAI-compatible endpoint is production-ready by default.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Any gateway requires authentication, authorization, rate limits, input bounds, logging, network isolation, model-license review, and deployment-specific security testing.", "evidence": [ { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-8557A53B-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true }, { "report_slug": "architectural-synergies-in-local-inference-colibri-expert-streaming-for-tinyrustlm", "title": "Architectural Synergies in Local Inference: Colibri Expert Streaming for TinyRustLM", "path": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/architectural-synergies-in-local-inference-colibri-expert-streaming-for-tinyrustlm.md", "source_name": "Colibri Repository Analysis.md", "source_sha256": "c3a9003320cbfc668e0ea350f013f91a7bb861b2a396366b6ca615632d2787d5", "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations", "reviewed_utc": "2026-07-21T23:45:00Z", "review_summary": "The report is retained as an architecture thought experiment. Colibri’s expert streaming and TinyRustLM’s browser-local model workflow are real published projects, but mapping one system’s internal experts to a fleet of separate small models is an analogy, not a proven implementation.", "fairness_boundary": "Local inference may improve privacy and autonomy but can shift hardware, energy, storage, maintenance, language-quality, and accessibility burdens to users. Evaluate those burdens across regions and devices.", "claims": [ { "topic": "Colibri architecture", "source_claim": "Colibri publicly describes disk-streamed experts for GLM-5.2.", "disposition": "verified-current", "corrected_statement": "The official repository supports this limited description; all scale and performance details remain upstream claims tied to a specific revision.", "evidence": [ { "title": "JustVugg/colibri — official repository and documentation", "url": "https://github.com/JustVugg/colibri" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CF6C81CE-01" }, { "topic": "TinyRustLM execution", "source_claim": "TinyRustLM publicly presents browser-local .slm inference with no prompts sent to a server in local mode.", "disposition": "verified-current", "corrected_statement": "This is the site’s stated local-mode boundary. Optional hosted-memory, companion, P2P, or external metadata features require separate data-flow review.", "evidence": [ { "title": "TinyRustLM — browser-local runtime publication", "url": "https://tinyrustlm.com/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "medium", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CF6C81CE-02" }, { "topic": "architectural equivalence", "source_claim": "MoE expert routing and orchestration of independent SLMs are mathematically identical.", "disposition": "rejected", "corrected_statement": "They are useful analogies but not equivalent systems: weights, tokenizers, context, latency, state, routing, security, and failure modes differ.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CF6C81CE-03" }, { "topic": "adapter/model swapping", "source_claim": "Colibri techniques can be directly transplanted into TinyRustLM.", "disposition": "design-hypothesis", "corrected_statement": "Any reuse requires a written interface, model-admission rules, cache coherence design, memory measurements, failure recovery, and tests. No implementation is established here.", "evidence": [ { "title": "JustVugg/colibri — official repository and documentation", "url": "https://github.com/JustVugg/colibri" }, { "title": "TinyRustLM — browser-local runtime publication", "url": "https://tinyrustlm.com/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CF6C81CE-04" }, { "topic": "performance projections", "source_claim": "Projected latency, cache, throughput, or resource savings are established.", "disposition": "not-established", "corrected_statement": "Treat all projections as hypotheses until benchmarked on representative browsers, devices, models, storage, and network states.", "evidence": [], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CF6C81CE-05" }, { "topic": "privacy", "source_claim": "Local inference is automatically private.", "disposition": "corrected", "corrected_statement": "Privacy depends on every enabled path, including telemetry, hosted memory, P2P exchange, model retrieval, browser storage, crash reporting, and companion applications.", "evidence": [ { "title": "TinyRustLM — browser-local runtime publication", "url": "https://tinyrustlm.com/" }, { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "date_sensitivity": "high", "publication_decision": "use-corrected-synthesis", "claim_id": "CR-OPS2-213-CF6C81CE-06" } ], "reviewed_synthesis_anchor": "reviewed-synthesis", "source_body_preserved": true } ], "authoritative_source_registry": [ { "title": "European Commission — AI Act application timeline", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai" }, { "title": "White House — Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions", "url": "https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/initial-rescissions-of-harmful-executive-orders-and-actions/" }, { "title": "White House — Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/removing-barriers-to-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence/" }, { "title": "NIST — AI Risk Management Framework 1.0", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework" }, { "title": "UNESCO — Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics" }, { "title": "Council of Europe — Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence", "url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence" }, { "title": "W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/" }, { "title": "IARPA — About IARPA", "url": "https://www.iarpa.gov/who-we-are/about-us" }, { "title": "WHO/OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080737" }, { "title": "WHO — Guidance on community mental health services", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707" }, { "title": "NIMH — Understanding Psychosis", "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis" }, { "title": "FTC — Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule", "url": "https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule-coppa" }, { "title": "Ofcom — Highly effective age assurance duties", "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online" }, { "title": "European Commission — EU approach to age verification", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-age-verification" }, { "title": "JustVugg/colibri — official repository and documentation", "url": "https://github.com/JustVugg/colibri" }, { "title": "TinyRustLM — browser-local runtime publication", "url": "https://tinyrustlm.com/" }, { "title": "MiRust — TinyRustLM technical guides", "url": "https://mirust.com/guides/" }, { "title": "OWASP — Application Security Verification Standard", "url": "https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/" } ], "truth_boundary": "This register records repository publication decisions and selected claim review. It does not prove legal compliance, clinical validity, product certification, or exhaustive correctness of every archival sentence." }